BackgroundSingle embryo transfer (SET) remains underutilized as a strategy to reduce multiple gestation risk in IVF, and its overall lower pregnancy rate underscores the need for improved techniques to select one embryo for fresh transfer. This study explored use of comprehensive chromosomal screening by array CGH (aCGH) to provide this advantage and improve pregnancy rate from SET.MethodsFirst-time IVF patients with a good prognosis (age <35, no prior miscarriage) and normal karyotype seeking elective SET were prospectively randomized into two groups: In Group A, embryos were selected on the basis of morphology and comprehensive chromosomal screening via aCGH (from d5 trophectoderm biopsy) while Group B embryos were assessed by morphology only. All patients had a single fresh blastocyst transferred on d6. Laboratory parameters and clinical pregnancy rates were compared between the two groups.ResultsFor patients in Group A (n = 55), 425 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed via aCGH (7.7 blastocysts/patient). Aneuploidy was detected in 191/425 (44.9%) of blastocysts in this group. For patients in Group B (n = 48), 389 blastocysts were microscopically examined (8.1 blastocysts/patient). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the morphology + aCGH group compared to the morphology-only group (70.9 and 45.8%, respectively; p = 0.017); ongoing pregnancy rate for Groups A and B were 69.1 vs. 41.7%, respectively (p = 0.009). There were no twin pregnancies.ConclusionAlthough aCGH followed by frozen embryo transfer has been used to screen at risk embryos (e.g., known parental chromosomal translocation or history of recurrent pregnancy loss), this is the first description of aCGH fully integrated with a clinical IVF program to select single blastocysts for fresh SET in good prognosis patients. The observed aneuploidy rate (44.9%) among biopsied blastocysts highlights the inherent imprecision of SET when conventional morphology is used alone. Embryos randomized to the aCGH group implanted with greater efficiency, resulted in clinical pregnancy more often, and yielded a lower miscarriage rate than those selected without aCGH. Additional studies are needed to verify our pilot data and confirm a role for on-site, rapid aCGH for IVF patients contemplating fresh SET.

To assess the association of zona pellucida micromanipulation and subsequent development of monozygotic twins, cases of assisted embryo hatching (AH) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were identified and related to treatment type, implantation and zygosity data. Embryology records from all patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) at this centre from January 1995 to March 1998 were reviewed. In this study, 3546 transfer cycles were completed, with clinical pregnancy established in 1911 (54% per transfer) patients undergoing a single IVF cycle. These pregnancies occurred in 1674 (88%) IVF cycles, 120 (6%) donor oocyte cycles (DER), and 117 (6%) frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. During the study period, 23 cases of monozygotic (MZ) twins were identified, representing an overall frequency of 1.2%. Chorionicity was determined by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks when the number of embryos transferred was less than the number of fetal heart-beats, or when >1 fetal heartbeat per gestational sac was seen. Zygosity was confirmed by placental evaluation at delivery, and corroborated the antenatal diagnosis in all cases. Among IVF study patients the frequency of MZ twinning was not statistically different between zona manipulated and zona intact subgroups. While this investigation is the largest to date describing the relationship between MZ twins and zona procedures, studies with even greater statistical power are needed to clarify it more precisely, particularly in DER and FET settings. A greater overall frequency of MZ twinning for IVF patients may be a function of the higher number of embryos transferred in IVF, rather than discrete zona manipulations.