The bispectral index (BIS) and a sedation score were used to determine and compare the effect of propofol in the presence of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil. Seventy-five non-premedicated patients were assigned randomly into five groups (15 in each) to receive fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil, sufentanil or placebo. Opioids were administered using a target-con-trolled infusion device, to obtain the following predicted effect-site concentrations: fentanyl, 1.5 ng ml(-1); alfentanil, 100 ng ml(-1); remifentanil, 6 ng ml(-1); and sufentanil, 0.2 ng ml(-1). After this, a target-controlled infusion of propofol (Diprifusor) was started to increase concentration gradually, to achieve predicted effect-site concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 microg ml(-1). At baseline and at each successive target effect-site concentration of propofol, the BIS, sedation score and haemodynamic variables were recorded. At the moment of loss of consciousness (LOC), the BIS and the effect-site concentration of propofol were noted. The relationship between propofol effect-site concentration and BIS was preserved with or without opioids. In the presence of an opioid, LOC occurred at a lower effect-site concentration of propofol and at a higher BIS50 (i.e. the BIS value associated with 50% probability of LOC), compared with placebo. Although clinically the hypnotic effect of propofol is enhanced by analgesic concentrations of mu-agonist opioids, the BIS does not show this increased hypnotic effect.
Short-term exposure of immature developing GABAergic neurons to clinically relevant concentrations of propofol can induce long-term changes in dendritic arbor development. These results suggest that propofol anesthesia during central nervous system development could interfere with the molecular mechanisms driving the differentiation of GABAergic neurons and thus could potentially lead to impairment of neural networks.
We have investigated the interaction between magnesium sulphate 40 mg kg-1 i.v. and vecuronium. First, we determined the effect of pretreatment with magnesium on the potency of vecuronium using a single bolus dose-response technique. In addition, we compared the time course of vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block (vecuronium 100 micrograms kg-1) with and without magnesium pretreatment. For both parts, neuromuscular block was assessed by electromyography. In addition, the effect of magnesium pretreatment on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block was investigated in the context of rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. We found that the neuromuscular potency of vecuronium was increased by pretreatment with magnesium sulphate. The ED50 and ED90 of vecuronium with MgSO4 were 25% lower than without MgSO4 (ED50: 21.3 vs 26.9 micrograms kg-1; ED90: 34.2 vs 45.7 micrograms kg-1; P < 0.05 for both). Mean onset time was 147.3 (SD 22.2) s in the MgSO4-vecuronium group vs 297.3 (122) s for controls (P < 0.05). Clinical duration was prolonged (MgSO4-vecuronium 43.3 (9) min vs 25.2 (5.1) min for controls; P < 0.05). This was also true for the recovery index (20.1 (6.6) min vs 10.6 (3.4) min; P < 0.05) and duration to 75% recovery (63.4 (9.9) min vs 35.8 (6.9) min; P < 0.05). In the context of rapid sequence induction, pretreatment with MgSO4 improved the intubating score of vecuronium compared with vecuronium without MgSO4, reaching the same quality as that with suxamethonium 1 mg kg-1. We conclude that magnesium pretreatment increased the neuromuscular potency of vecuronium, in addition to modifying the time course of its neuromuscular block.
Sugammadex, 1.0 mg/kg, rapidly and effectively reverses rocuronium-induced block that has recovered spontaneously to a threshold TOF-count-four. A dose of 0.5 mg/kg was equally effective, but satisfactory antagonism took as long as 8 min to take place.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.