Background. The implementation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors into clinical practice improved treatment outcomes in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line drug for these patients. The study objective is to analyze clinical experience with lenvatinib in patients with RR-DTC in the Russian Federation. Materials and methods. The data from 18 clinical sites in Russia was analyzed for the period December 2015 and September 2019. Seventyseven patients with histologically verified DTC, proven resistance to radioactive iodine therapy, and tumor progression (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria) were included in the study. Results.Median progression-free survival in patients included into analysis (n = 72) was 26.1 months. In patients who responded to therapy (including those with partial and complete response), median progression-free survival reached 36.2 months, which is higher than that reported in the updated results of the SELECT study (33.1 months). Lenvatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) were observed in 87 % of patients. Severe AEs were registered in 18.2 % of participants. In 6.5 % of cases, AEs lead to lenvatinib cessation; in 74 % of cases, AEs required dose reduction.Conclusion. Our findings suggest high efficacy and good tolerability of lenvatinib in patients with RR-DTC in routine clinical practice in the Russian Federation.

Objective. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate and duration, tumor control rate and duration, as well as safety profile of lenvatinib with everolimus in consecutive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who had disease progression after targeted antiangiogenic therapy.Materials and methods. This observational study included 129 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma resistant to targeted antiangiogenic therapy. The median age was 60 years; a male to female ratio was 3.1:1. Twenty-seven patients (20.9 %) had ECOG performance status of 2—4. The majority of study participants (n = 127; 98.4 %) had multiple metastases. Tumor lesions were located in >1 organ in 104 cases (80.6 %). The primary tumor was removed in 110 (85.3 %), including 39 (30.2 %) patients undergone cytoreductive surgery. Seventy patients (54.2 %) had earlier received more than one line of therapy. Upon enrollment, there were 13 IMDC favourable-risk patients (10.1 %), 86 IMDC intermediate-risk patients (66.6 %), and 29 IMDC poor-risk patients (22.5 %). In one patient (0.8 %), the IMDC risk was not estimated. All patients received lenvatinib at a dose of 18 mg/day and everolimus at a dose of 5 mg/day. The median follow-up was 10.5 (1—30) months.Results. Median progression-free survival was 14.9 (11.9—17.9) months; overall survival was 19.9 (15.2—24.6) months. The objective response rate was 17.0 % (median duration 9.7 (2.8—16.5) months); tumor control rate was 72.9 % (median duration 10.0 (2.5—17.5) months). Adverse events were observed in 112patients (86.8 %) with grade III—IVadverse events registered in 27participants (20.9 %). Five participants (3.9 %) needed inpatient treatment of adverse events; one patient (0.8 %) died due to adverse events. Adverse events required treatment discontinuation in 4 patients (3.1 %), treatment interruption in 35 patients (27.1 %), and dose reduction in 33 patients (25.6 %).Conclusion. The results of the secondary analysis in the ROSLERCM observational study confirmed the results obtained earlier on the efficacy and safety of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination in the second- and subsequent-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma resistant to targeted antiangiogenic therapy in consecutive Russian patients.

No abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most formidable and deadly cancers. The limited possibilities of surgical methods of treatment as well as the formation of multiple drug resistance caused by the biological characteristics of both the liver tissue itself and tumor cells with their microenvironment determine the unsatisfactory indicators of relapse free survival and overall survival of patients. In addition, therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which has become the “gold” standard, has limited possibilities: a large number of side effects significantly reduce the quality of life and adherence to treatment in patients with hepatocellular cancer. The search for molecular biological targets, as well as new therapeutic agents that block these targets, does not always lead to positive results. Immunotherapy in this sense is a priority, having good tolerance, a low number of side effects, no need for additional testing of the patient’s biological material before starting treatment, high efficiency and a long response time. However, there are many unresolved questions about the duration of therapy, predicting its efficacy, the optimal combination of drugs or the use of monotherapy, the formation of priority subgroups of patients. Understanding the mechanisms of immune evasion, an ability that hepatocellular carcinoma possesses, – is the key to successful use of immunotherapeutic agents alone, in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antiangiogenic drugs or among themselves. This article provides an overview of data from clinical studies of modern drugs for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and describes the mechanism of liver immunological tolerance as a possible predictive marker of sensitivity to immunotherapy. It seems promising to study the role of cells in the microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma for predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy. The clinical example is used to demonstrate the successful experience of using the immunotherapeutic drug nivolumab in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This is a classic example of duration of response to therapy, lack of reactivation of chronic viral hepatitis and controlled toxicity. All these indicators enable the clinician to consider immunotherapy as a priority option for the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma.