Background and Purpose
To quantify uncertainties in scoring radiation pneumonitis.
Materials and Methods
Records of 434 patients irradiated for lung cancer from 2000–2010 were retrospectively reviewed; IRB-approved study. From these, 121 received ≥60 Gy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ≥6 months follow-up. Patients where the physicians were uncertain of the diagnosis due to confounding factors were deemed “hard to score”. Subgroups were defined based on lung dosimetric parameters, and frequencies in different subgroups were compared via Fisher’s exact test.
Results
21/121 of patients were considered to have pneumonitis; median follow 17 months. Of these, 10/21 were “hard to score”; reasons including acute COPD exacerbation, infection, and tumor progression. “Hard to score” pneumonitis was slightly more common in patients with a COPD history (15%) vs. without COPD (4%) (p=0.05); and with a pre-RT FEV1 < 1.7L (16%) vs. ≥ 1.7L (4%) (p=0.09). Rates of “unambiguous” pneumonitis trended to be non-significantly slightly higher in patients higher mean lung doses, V5, and V30.
Conclusion
Radiation pneumonitis occurred in 17% of patients undergoing RT for NSCLC; with diagnostic uncertainty in 48% of these. Poor pre-RT pulmonary function increases the rate of “hard to score” pneumonitis. Dosimetric parameters are slightly better related to “unambiguous” than “hard to score” pneumonitis, as expected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.