ObjectiveWhile many studies have reported that laser ablation (LA) for benign non-fuctioning thyroid nodules is efficacious in reducing nodular volume and neck symptoms, none have described changes in quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to report post-LA changes in QoL in our cohort of patients.Materials and MethodsFourteen patients with benign thyroid nodules were involved in a prospective, single-center study and underwent a single session of LA. We evaluated the following: changes in nodule volume, thyroid function, and autoimmunity; adverse events during and after LA; changes in neck discomfort by means of a visual analogic scale (VAS) at one week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and changes in QoL through the 13-scale Thyroid-specific Patient Reported Outcome (ThyPRO) questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. ThyPRO is a validated questionnaire for thyroid diseases, which consists of 13 scales with multiple-choice answers. They investigate several aspects of life that may be impaired by goiter-related compression symptoms, by esthetic alterations and by hypo- or hyperthyroidism.ResultsNodule volume decrease was −37 ± 23%, −55 ± 22%, −53 ± 25%, −58 ± 25% (p < 0.01 vs. baseline) at the first, third, sixth, and twelfth month, respectively. No hypothyroidism or positivization of autoimmunity was observed. There were no major complications during or after LA. After LA, VAS scores improved significantly from 1 week onwards in 100% of patients, while a significant improvement was seen in the goiter symptoms score after one month, and in the general score and mean values of ThyPRO after six months. Scores on the other ThyPRO scales did not change significantly.ConclusionLaser ablation is safe and effective in reducing nodule volume and neck symptoms; this is confirmed by improvements in the goiter scale, general score, and mean values of ThyPRO and in the VAS score.
Background: Many studies have reported mean reductions in nodule volumes and described improvements in the sense of pressure and aesthetic symptoms after radiofrequency ablation. The aim of our study was to document changes in quality of life by means of a 13-scale questionnaire named ThyPRO in a cohort of patients treated with radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules. Moreover, we assessed the efficacy and safety of the procedure and correlations between efficacy and some features both of the treated nodules and of patients, and evaluated improvements in neck discomfort by means of a visual analogic scale. Methods: 32 patients with benign thyroid nodules were treated with radiofrequency ablation. We evaluated nodule volume, thyroid function and autoimmunity before and after procedures, adverse events during and after procedures, changes in neck discomfort by means of a visual analogic scale and changes in quality of life through the ThyPRO questionnaire at 1, 3, 6 12, 24 and 36 months. We sought correlations between response to radiofrequency ablation and some features of procedures and patients. We divided patients into 2 groups, according to their mean percentage of nodule volume reduction: group 1 (reduction >30%) and group 2 (reduction <30%) to evaluate whether ThyPRO questionnaire scores changed in patients in whom thyroid RFA was more effective. Results: At the last evaluation, nodule volume reduction was 45±9 in group 1, 11±9 in group 2 and 40±25% in the total population. We found a correlation between better volume reduction and greater patient age. Thyroid function and autoimmunity were not modified. Adverse events were few and mild. Visual analogic scale scores improved, though scores on the individual ThyPRO scales did not change, even in group 1. The general subjective impact of thyroid disease on quality of life improved from the 3rd month onwards. Conclusions: In our cohort of patients, quality of life, as evaluated through ThyPRO, did not improve after radiofrequency for benign thyroid nodules. In the literature, changes in quality of life in patients treated with radiofrequency ablation for thyroid nodules have been described in only one paper, while changes in quality of life assessed by means of ThyPRO have never been described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.