Depuis leur retour en France, les loups suscitent des controverses et des conflits en lien avec leurs impacts sur les troupeaux domestiques. La persistance de ces conflits depuis 30 ans tient au croisement de différentes questions de nature éthologique, écologique, sociale, économique, politique, juridique, articulées à différentes échelles locales et globales (Dumez et al., 2017) que l'on trouve plus généralement dans les conflits humains/faune sauvage (Redpath et al. 2013). Parmi ces multiples questions, un des enjeux touche aux devenirs des territoires ruraux et montagnards concernés par les loups. Alors que ces territoires font l'objet de projections divergentes sur la manière dont la conservation de la biodiversité ou l'élevage agro-pastoral doivent être pris en compte, leur devenir n'est pas réellement posé comme un enjeu politique à débattre collectivement. 2Or, les loups mettent en évidence les injonctions contradictoires et les impensés théoriques et politiques, dans l'articulation entre conservation des biodiversités remarquables, ordinaires et l'alimentation, auxquelles font face ces territoires. Investies d'un rôle de productions alimentaire, paysagère, et de préservation Territorialiser la question des loups par les pratiques agri-alimentaires. Un...
Since their return to France, wolves have been the subject of much controversy and the cause of many conflicts due to their impact on domestic herds. The persistence of such conflicts over the last 30 years is tied to a combination of ethological, ecological, social, economic, political and legal issues, each articulated at various local and global scales (Dumez et al., 2017), found more generally in human/wildlife conflict (Redpath et al. 2013). Among these many issues, one challenge relates to the future of rural and mountainous regions affected by wolves. While these regions are the topic of diverging forecasts regarding the manner in which biodiversity conservation or agropastoral breeding should be handled, their future is not really seen as a political issue requiring a collective debate.2 Yet, wolves highlight the contradictory injunctions and the overlooked theoretical and political ideas in terms of the relationship between the conservation of remarkable and ordinary biodiversity and food that mountainous regions are faced with. Acting as food producer, landscape creator and environmental preserver, agropastoral practices have committed towards greening approaches that have been recognised by public policies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.