SummaryThe aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily subcutaneous injection of dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin, with that of intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Patients were included if they had deep venous thrombosis distal to inguinal ligament and were randomised either before, if it was considered necessary, or after phlebographic verification of the diagnosis. There was no pre-inclusion treatment with unfractionated heparin. One hundred and twenty patients received dalteparin, administered subcutaneously once-daily at a fixed dose of 200 IU anti-factor Xa/kg, and 133 patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH). Oral anticoagulation was started on the first or second day, and initial treatment with dalteparin or UFH discontinued when the prothrombin time was in the therapeutic range (2<INR<3) on two consecutive days. Control phlebograms were taken within 4 days, thereafter. There were no significant differences between the two initial treatment groups in improvements in Marder score. Two major bleeding events occurred in the UFH group versus none in the dalteparin group. One patient in each group experienced clinically significant pulmonary embolism. During a mean follow-up period of 6.9 ± 1.5 months, recurrent DVT occurred in four patients in the dalteparin group and in two of the UFH group. These results confirm those of a previous study on dalteparin in the initial treatment of DVT, and suggest that dalteparin administered once-daily at a fixed dose of 200 UI/kg is as effective and well-tolerated as UFH in patients with DVT below the inguinal ligament. The present study also demonstrates that dalteparin can be started as soon as the diagnosis of DVT is suspected and without pre-treatment with UFH. Given that the administration of once-daily subcutaneous injections needs not require a patient to be hospitalised, studies to investigate the possibility of using dalteparin for the initial treatment of DVT in the outpatient setting are warranted.
In lone PAF, GERD should be investigated as a potential pathogenetic mechanism. PPI therapy reduces not only GERD-related but also PAF-related symptoms.
This report describes a 66-year-old Caucasian male who acutely developed severe, bilateral impairment of visual acuity at 24 years of age. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) was suspected but the diagnosis was not genetically confirmed until the age of 49 years when the primary LHON mutation m.3460G>A was detected. Since onset, visual acuity had slightly improved. The family history was positive for LHON (brother, two sisters of mother, female cousin) and genetically confirmed in his brother and one aunt. Since the age of 65 years, he had experienced recurrent vertigo. His cardiological history was positive for arterial hypertension, noncompaction, myocardial thickening, intermittent right bundle-branch-block (RBBB) and Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. In addition to LHON, he presented with polyneuropathy, hyperCKaemia, carotid artery occlusion, and a history of stroke. Cardiological investigations at 66 years of age revealed mildly reduced systolic function, enlarged atria, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardias. He underwent an electrophysiological investigation, but radiofrequency ablation was ruled out due to a ‘bizarre’ cardiac conduction system. Instead, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was proposed but refused by the patient. Since the vertigo did not resolve it was attributed to polyneuropathy. This case demonstrates that LHON may be associated with noncompaction, myocardial thickening, reduced systolic function, enlarged atria, RBBB, WPW syndrome and nonsustained ventricular tachycardias. WPW syndrome in LHON may require invasive antiarrhythmic treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.