COSTRUENDO RICOSTRUZIONI: RIVENDICAZIONI E REALTÀ DELLE ISCRIZIONI DA RIEDIFICAZIONI ROMANE PROVENIENTI DAL LATINUM OCCIDENTALEIn quest'articolo gli Autori analizzano l'atteggiamento che in epoca romana veniva riservato alia riedificazione e al restauro di edifici, utilizzando in particolare le iscrizioni di riedificazione rinvenute nella parte occidentale dell'Impero (Roma esclusa); inoltre, dove possibile, le iscrizioni sono confrontate con le evidenze archeologiche. Viene dimostrato qui che non sempre tali iscrizioni descrivono in maniera accurata i danni precedenti alla ricostruzione o il tipo di lavori eseguiti. Il loro linguaggio è spesso metaforico e vengono stabilite nozioni di distruzione e ricostruzione che non necessariamente hanno una diretta relazione con il reale stato dell'edificio o con i lavori di restauro eseguiti. La parola ‘ricostruzione’ era in generale considerata sotto un punto di vista idealistico espresso in modi diversi, colleganti fatti architettonici locali, spesso complessi, ad un'idea simbolica di rinnovamento. Quindi, a meno che una singola causa reale non sia menzionata, le iscrizioni di riedificazione non riportano nessun dato definitivo circa le circostanze reali della distruzione o della ricostruzione di un edificio. Queste devono essere studiate individualmente e non devono influenzare l'analisi indipendente dei resti archeologici.
At Miletus we saw a distinction between the workmen contracted to construct the arcades and the architect who designed them. Ancient building projects were usually dominated by architects, who directed a large number of subordinate workmen. Whereas the workmen sometimes challenged an instruction, the architect at the top identified more with the project, and his opportunity for social prestige was greater. Since Aristotle, architects were considered to be both ‘wiser’ and ‘more valued’ than manual workers, because they knew the ‘causes’ of a building project. At Patara it was not only the Velii Proculi as patrons who gained glory from new architectural forms. In the odeion stood a statue to the architect Dionysius of Sardis. He is described as ‘skilled in all works of Athena’, which recalls the mention of this goddess at Miletus; but the ‘future fame’ that his statue commemorated was for a work of architecture and engineering of which any Roman would have been proud: the great roof over the odeion itself. Another who made a professional reputation for himself beyond his home city was Marcus Aurelius Pericles of Mylasa, who was honoured at Rome for his success in architecture, described as ‘the greatest art of countless people’. To understand the monumentality of Roman architecture, then, we need to consider the views of architects. One should bear in mind, however, that the architectural profession in antiquity was very diverse. Indeed, there was no idea of a ‘profession’ at all in the modern sense of recognized qualifications and a relatively stable corporate identity. It is difficult to evaluate the social position of those architects whose names are recorded across the Roman Empire, as the mainly epigraphic evidence for their existence is both diffuse and varied, coming from areas as heterogeneous in social structure as imperial Rome, cities in Asia Minor, villages in late Roman Syria, and military settlements on the north-western frontier. In Greece and Asia Minor an individual called an architektōn might have been either a civic magistrate, with no professional activity in the design process, though sometimes involved with public building; a religious official, with responsibility for the buildings of a sanctuary; or a practising architect, either employed by a city or working independently.
The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.