Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) induces a whole body inflammatory response leading to postoperative lung dysfunction. Activated leukocytes may play a role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary dysfunction. We evaluated postoperative lung function after the use of leukocyte-depleting filters incorporated in the extracorporeal circuit during CPB. From November 1997 to March 2000, 40 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients were randomly allocated to the leukocyte-depletion group (group F, 20 patients) or to the control group (group C, 20 patients). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age, sex, weight, height, body surface area, haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, cooling temperature, aortic crossclamping and CBP duration. Blood samples were drawn preoperatively, at aortic declamping, 60 min after CPB, after arriving at the intensive care unit (ICU) and 24 h after the operation. We analysed blood cell count, elastase, interleukin-8 (IL-8) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) levels and continuous monitoring of arterial blood gases in the intensive care unit (ICU). The analysis of total circulating white blood cells (WBCs) showed a significant reduction of WBCs in both groups soon after aortic declamping [from the right atrium: 6.4 x 10(9)/l +/- 1.4 x 10(9)/l in group F vs 10.3 +/- 1.8 x 10(9)/l in group C (p<0.05); from the left atrium: 5.8 +/- 1.3 x 10(9)/l in group F vs 8.4 +/- 1.9 x 10(9)/l in group C (p<0.05)] and after 60 min of CPB [7.1 +/- 2.2 x 10(9)/l in group F vs 10.4 +/- 1.8 x 10(9)/l in group C (p<0.05)]. The analysis of circulating neutrophils showed similar findings in both groups. Elastase levels increased during CPB in both groups with a peak at the end of CPB without significant difference between the two groups (group C: 260 +/- 148 microg/l vs group F: 371 +/- 68 microg/l). The decrease of plasmatic elestase levels was observed, for both groups, in the 24 h after CPB. There was no difference in intubation time between the two groups (16.4 h for group C vs 11.2 h for group F). Pulmonary function tested by pulmonary respiratory index [RI = partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2 x 100)] did not show significant difference between the two groups, either arriving in the ICU (group C RI 265 vs group F RI 322), or after 3 h (group RI 304 vs group F RI 305) or after 6 h (group C RI 292 vs group F RI 319). Leukocyte-depleting filters reduce with blood cells count during CPB, but, in this study, WBC depletion did not significantly improve clinical conditions or laboratory finding.

The correct monitoring of heparin therapy and its reversal determines the successful conduct of cardiovascular surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC). The activated coagulation time (ACT) and the heparin management test (HMT) are the most frequently used tests in the operating room. Three compact monitors for ACT or HMT are here evaluated. Forty samples were obtained, at 10-min intervals, from eight patients during ECC. The ACT or HMT was immediately performed using: Hemochron juniors ACT, CoaguCeck Pro (ACT) and Rapid Point Coag (HMT). Data were compared between them and with the heparin levels, measured as anti-Xa. The simple least squares linear regression among, respectively, Hemochron Junior ACT, CoaguCeck Pro ACT, Rapid Point Coag HMT and anti-Xa activity were i=452.3, s=15.2, Sy/x=37.5, r=0.18; i=411.9, s=22.1, Sy/x=48.7, r=0.21 and i=479.4, s=9.0, Sy/x=9.3; r=0.41. CoaguCeck Pro ACT results were above the upper detection limit (500 s) in 37 of 40 determinations. The comparison between ACT Hemocron and HMT Rapid Point Coag shows i=35.7, s=0.9, Sy/x=35.4, r=0.68, with a bias of 29.0 s (CI: 17.9-40.1), 95% of agreement between -41.5 s (CI: -60.7 to -22.3) and 99.5 s (CI: 80.4-118.7). Taking a concentration of 2.0 U/ml of heparin to discriminate between high- and low-risk conditions, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to rank the performance of the methods. Areas under the ROC curve+/-SE for Hemochron Junior ACT and Rapid Point Coag HMT were 0.629+/-0.097 and 0.543+/-0.096. The results obtained by HMT appear similar to those obtained by the ACT for monitoring high-dose heparin therapy in patients undergoing ECC. HMT appeared to perform better than ACT in measuring the heparin effect, while the ROC analysis gives a little more accuracy for ACT. Neither of the two methods is able to achieve enough evidence of diagnostic accuracy. Since these tests are widely used, and there are no laboratory alternatives, a real comparison with the outcome of the patients should be helpful for an evidence-based evaluation of these point-of-care tests.

No abstract