AimsA specialized three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography (3D-TOE) reconstruction tool has recently been introduced; the system automatically configures a geometric model of the aortic root from the images obtained by 3D-TOE and performs quantitative analysis of these structures. The aim of this study was to compare the measurements of the aortic annulus (AA) obtained by the new model to that obtained by 3D-TOE and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in candidates to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to assess the reproducibility of this new method. Methods and resultsWe included 31 patients who underwent TAVI. The AA diameters and area were evaluated by the manual 3D-TOE method and by the automatic software. We showed an excellent correlation between the measurements obtained by both methods: intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.731 (0.508 -0.862), r: 0.742 for AA diameter and ICC: 0.723 (0.662-0.923), r: 0.723 for the AA area, with no significant differences regardless of the method used. The interobserver variability was superior for the automatic measurements than for the manual ones. In a subgroup of 10 patients, we also found an excellent correlation between the automatic measurements and those obtained by MDCT, ICC: 0.941 (0.761-0.985), r: 0.901 for AA diameter and ICC: 0.853 (0.409-0.964), r: 0.744 for the AA area. ConclusionThe new automatic 3D-TOE software allows modelling and quantifying the aortic root from 3D-TOE data with high reproducibility. There is good correlation between the automated measurements and other 3D validated techniques. Our results support its use in clinical practice as an alternative to MDCT previous to TAVI.--

The indication for surgery in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation (SMR) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is controversial. We sought to study 3D myocardial mechanics in this population and test 3D-speckle tracking (3DST) parameters as possible predictors of events. 45 asymptomatic patients with SMR and LVEF >60 % and 20 control individuals without cardiac disease underwent 3DST echocardiography. MR group additionally underwent further clinical monitoring. Dyspnea, LVEF under 60 %, or admissions for heart failure were considered as events. When compared with control group, MR group showed lower percentage of global 3D strain, (35.4 ± 9.1 vs. 43.9 ± 10.6; p = 0.003), lower radial strain, lower area change rate and higher end-diastolic volume. In a follow-up time of 23.2 ± 14.5 months we found 15 events (33.3 %). When comparing the remaining patients with this new-onset HF group we found significant differences in longitudinal strain (-17.9 ± 3.3 vs. -15.8 ± 2.1; p = 0.036), area strain (AS) (-48.6 ± 4.6 vs. -43.7 ± 6.2; p = 0.006), circumferential strain (-35.8 ± 4.7 vs. -31.8 ± 6.1; p = 0.034), 3D LVEF (67.1 ± 4.6 vs. 63.0 ± 7.4; p = 0.034) and E/E' index (13.5 ± 3.9 vs. 19.3 ± 9.5; p = 0.006). In multivariate Cox regression AS alone was the only independent predictor. A cutoff value of AS greater than -41.6 % reached a hazard ratio of 4.41 (p = 0.004) for prediction of events. In asymptomatic patients with SMR and preserved ejection fraction, 3DST derived AS is a promising tool for predicting the development of heart failure. This finding may be useful for guiding the selection of patients for early mitral valve repair/replacement surgery even if they are asymptomatic.

Background: There is no consensus on which right ventricle (RV) strain parameter should be used in the clinical practice: four chamber RV longitudinal strain (4CH RV-LS) or free wall longitudinal strain (FWLS). The aim of this study was to analyze which RV strain parameter better predicts prognosis in patients with left heart disease. Methods: One hundred and three outpatients with several degrees of functional tricuspid regurgitation severity secondary to left heart disease were prospectively included. 4CH RV-LS and FWLS were assessed using speckle tracking. Left ventricular (LV) systolic function was determined using LV ejection fraction and RV systolic function using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE).Patients were followed up for 23.1 ± 12.4 months for an endpoint of cardiac hospitalization due to heart failure. [LR] = 22.033; p < 0.001); p < 0.001), TAPSE < 17 mm (LR = 17.4; p < 0.001) and LV systolic dysfunction (LR = 13.3; p < 0.001) [HR] = 3.593; p < 0.002), TAPSE < 17 (HR = 2.093; p < 0.055) and LV systolic dysfunction (HR = 2.087; p < 0,054) had prognostic value, whereas FWLS did not reach significance. Results: The cutoff value related to RV dysfunction (TAPSE < 17 mm) was lower, in absolute value, for 4CH RV-LS (4CH RV-LS = -17.3%; FWLS = -19.5%). There were 33 adverse events during the follow-up. Patients with 4CH RV-LS > -17.3% (log rank had lower event-free survival (Kaplan Meier). In Cox multivariate analysis, 4CH RV-LS > -17.3% (hazard ratio Conclusions: Although both 4CH RV-LS and FWLS have prognostic value, 4CH RV-LS isa better predictor of episodes of heart failure in patients with left heart disease, providing additional information to that obtained by TAPSE. (Cardiol J 2016; 23, 2: 189-194)

No abstract

A 70-year-old asymptomatic patient was referred for a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) for atrial fibrillation. TTE appreciated a mass in the aortic valve.3D transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) revealed a mobile 12 9 10 mm rounded mass (*) joined to the free edge of noncoronary cusp (NcC) of the aortic valve (Fig. 1A). The image analysis, in systole, allows more detailed information (movie clips S1 and S2). The mass is attached to the free edge of the leaflet through a narrow pedicle (p) of 5 mm length by 1 mm wide (Fig. 1B, C). Aortic valve anatomy and function were normal. The diagnosis of fibroelastoma was made. Figure 1. A . En face view from ascending aorta (left) and lateral view (right) in systole and diastole. A mobile rounded mass (*) joined to the free edge of NcC can be identified. B. Two-dimensional imaging obtained from 3D echocardiogram reveals the mass attached to a narrow p. C. 3D subtraction of the mass, p and NcC. D. Intraoperative findings allow visualization of the tumor. E. The surgical piece, once removed from the aortic valve. NcC = noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve; p = pedicle of the tumor.