Acute PE commonly complicates the hospital course of patients with severe CHF, increasing the length of hospital stay and the chance of death or rehospitalization at 3 months.
Patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) frequently have preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions (LVEFs). Although anemia is a common finding in this patient population, its prognostic role has not been well studied. This study's aim was to assess if the LVEF interferes in the association between anemia and in-hospital mortality in patients with severe HF. Consecutive patients admitted to an intensive care unit with decompensated chronic HF were prospectively enrolled. The diagnosis of HF was based on clinical criteria. Patients with LVEFs > or =45% (on echocardiography) were diagnosed as having preserved LVEFs. Multivariate analysis was performed to test the independent association between anemia and in-hospital mortality and to evaluate an interaction between anemia and systolic function. In all, 303 patients were recruited (mean age 69 +/- 13 years; 45.5% women). Preserved LVEFs were present in 34% of the population. The prevalence of anemia in this group was 58%, compared with 43% in the group with systolic dysfunction (p = 0.01). Dilated left ventricles, left bundle branch blocks, and valvular dysfunction were significantly more frequent in patients with systolic heart failure. In-hospital mortality was similar in the groups with preserved LVEFs and systolic dysfunction (p = 0.71). On multivariate analysis, anemia was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 5.04, p = 0.002). There was no interaction between anemia and systolic function (p = 0.08 for interaction). In conclusion, anemia was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in symptomatic patients with severe HF, regardless of whether the patients had preserved or impaired LV systolic function.
BackgroundA significant variation in pulmonary embolism (PE) mortality trends have been documented around the world. We investigated the trends in mortality rate from PE in Brazil over a period of 21 years and its regional and gender differences.MethodsUsing a nationwide database of death certificate information we searched for all cases with PE as the underlying cause of death between 1989 and 2010. Population data were obtained from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). We calculated age-, gender- and region-specific mortality rates for each year, using the 2000 Brazilian population for direct standardization.ResultsOver 21 years the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) fell 31% from 3.04/100,000 to 2.09/100,000. In every year between 1989 and 2010, the ASMR was higher in women than in men, but both showed a significant declining trend, from 3.10/100,000 to 2.36/100,000 and from 2.94/100,000 to 1.80/100,000, respectively. Although all country regions showed a decline in their ASMR, the largest fall in death rates was concentrated in the highest income regions of the South and Southeast Brazil. The North and Northeast regions, the lowest income areas, showed a less marked fall in death rates and no distinct change in the PE mortality rate in women.ConclusionsOur study showed a reduction in the PE mortality rate over two decades in Brazil. However, significant variation in this trend was observed amongst the five country regions and between genders, pointing to possible disparities in health care access and quality in these groups.
Resumo objetivo. Implementar um programa hospitalar de profilaxia de TEV através da criação de uma comissão, da realização de palestras e da distribuição de algoritmos baseados na Diretriz Brasileira para Profilaxia de TEV em Pacientes Clínicos e avaliar seu impacto na adequação da utilização de profilaxia em quatro hospitais de Salvador, Bahia. métodos. Foram realizados dois estudos de corte-transversal, um antes e um depois da implementação do programa, e comparadas as proporções de pacientes em risco de TEV e as mudanças na adequação da profilaxia. Resultados. Foram avaliados 219 pacientes clínicos antes e 292 depois do programa. As taxas daqueles com pelo menos um fator de risco para TEV e daqueles com contra indicação (CI) para heparina foram semelhantes nos dois grupos: 95% vs. 98% (p=0,13) e 42% vs. 34% (p=0,08), respectivamente. Nos dois estudos, 75% vs. 82% (p=0,06) eram candidates para profilaxia, e 44% vs. 55% (p =0,02) eram candidatos sem qualquer CI para heparina. Após o programa, utilizou-se mais profilaxia mecânica, 0,9% vs. 4,5% (p=0,03) e menos profilaxia farmacológica, 55,3% vs. 47,9% (p=0,04), embora tenha havido um aumento significativo na utilização das doses corretas das heparinas, 53% vs. 75% (p<0,001). Conclusão. A profilaxia de TEV é subutilizada nos hospitais brasileiros. Aulas de educação continuada e distribuição passiva de algoritmos de profilaxia de TEV são insuficientes para melhorar a utilização, mas melhoram a adequação da profilaxia. Artigo Original introduçãoEstudos controlados e randomizados em pacientes hospitalizados têm destacado que o risco de tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) em pacientes com condições clínicas diversas é comparável ao de pacientes cirúrgicos e que os eventos tromboembó-licos podem ser efetivamente evitados com o uso de profilaxia. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Estudos do tipo registro e enquetes em corte-transversal mostram que ainda existe extrema variabilidade na avaliação do risco e na utilização de profilaxia do TEV no Brasil e no mundo. 8,9 Além disto, a prescrição de profilaxia frequentemente não segue as orientações dos consensos nacionais e internacionais.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.