We performed a retrospective review of the charts of 252 adult, non-traumatic, prehospital cardiac arrest patients treated over a one-year period in order to assess the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) and endotracheal (ET) administration of epinephrine (0.5–1.0 mg) (EPI) in assisting restoration of a spontaneous pulse. Patients initially receiving IV-EPI were more likely to develop a spontaneous pulse earlier than those receiving a similar dose ET (7.3% vs 0.9%; p<0.01. In those patients who received a second dose of EPI, six (2.9%) regained a spontaneous pulse; each had been treated previously with IV-EPI. None who required a third dose of EPI regained a spontaneous pulse. In total, only five (2%) patients survived to discharge. We conclude that, in our system, patients who receive the currently recommended dose of EPI to treat cardiac arrest have a poor prognosis, and that IV-EPI is associated with a higher incidence of return of a spontaneous pulse compared to those treated ET.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.