We examined how adult children in Canada whose parents were hospitalized in an acute care setting perceived responsibility for their parents' care. Using a visual analogue scale, adult children rated the amount of financial, emotional, and physical support families "should" and "could" give to elderly persons described in four vignettes. All scores were high, with "should" consistently higher than "could" for every vignette and for each of the three types of support. For daughters, the more aggressive the parent, the lower the "should" score for financial support. The same relationship was observed for incontinence and these findings were consistent over all four vignettes.
Communication plays an important role within the surrogate-surgeon dyad. Psychologic variables such as expectations, and the perception of both the surrogates and the surgeons, influence the amount of information that is proffered and the manner in which it is received. Improved communication may be achieved by use of visual aids, discussion of anesthesia and the postoperative course, recognition of the circumstances around the discussion, such as timing and location of the discussion, and personalization of the discussion.
Objectives-This study was designed to identify and compare the attitudes ofpatients and health care professionals towards advance directives. Advance directives promote recognition of the patient's autonomy, letting the individual exercise a certain measure of control over life-sustaining care and treatments in the eventuality of becoming incompetent. Design-Attitudes to advance directives were evaluated using a 44-item self-reported questionnaire. It yields an overall score as well as five factor scores: autonomy, beneficence, justice, external norms, and the affective dimension.Setting-Health care institutions in the province of Quebec, Canada. Survey sample-The sampling consisted of 921 subjects: 123 patients, 167 physicians, 340 nurses and 291 administrators of health care institutions. Results-Although the general attitude of each population was favourable to the expression of autonomy, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated that physicians attached less importance to this subscale than did other populations (p < . 001). Above all, they favoured legal external norms and beneficence. Physicians and administrators also attached less importance to the affective dimension than did patients and nurses.Specifically, physicians' attitudes towards advance directives were shown to be less positive than patients' attitudes.Conclusion-More attention should be given to the importance of adequately informing patients about advance directives because they may not represent an adequate means for patients to assert their autonomy. (7ournal ofMedical Ethics 1998;24:328-335)
This article seeks to shed light on the beliefs that influence nurses' intention of respecting or not respecting an advance directive document, namely a living will or a durable power of attorney. Nurses' beliefs were measured using a 44-statement questionnaire. The sample was made up of 306 nurses working either in a long-term care centre or in a hospital centre offering general and specialized care in the province of Québec. The results indicate that nurses have a strong intention of complying with advance directives written by patients. The analysis also shows that four variables determine the strength of this intention: respect for autonomy; the location of the workplace; justice; and the dimension of relationships and emotions. Although these documents favour the expression of patients' wishes, nurses should be aware that they do not systematically guarantee respect of a patient's autonomy, nor do they replace a relationship based on trust between patients and health care professionals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.