Objective: To evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a surveillance program of overweight and obesity in preschool children in Calgary, and to provide advice for families to promote healthy weights. Participants and Setting: Children (mean age 4.9±0.6 years) attending pilot-site clinics in September 2002 and all clinics in Calgary between February 2003-December 2003 (n=7048). Intervention: The growth assessment protocol and resources supported a three-pronged approach to promote healthy weights (healthy eating, active living and positive body image). Public health nurses were trained in standardized measurement techniques and information resources. Links with physicians were made to facilitate continuity of care. Children's weight and height measurements were plotted on the Weight-for-Stature growth chart 7 and used to identify children as obese (>95th percentile), healthy weight (>5 th , <95 th) or underweight (<5 th). Subsequent analysis calculated the Body Mass Index (BMI)for-Age 16 to identify overweight children (>85 th , <95 th percentile). The protocol was pilot tested and subsequently implemented in all Calgary public health clinics. Outcomes: The majority (98%) of parents were either very happy or happy with information received during the visit. Public health nurse counselling confidence significantly improved after the pilot (p<0.001). Data indicated that 9% of children were obese, 15% were overweight and 3% were underweight. La traduction du résumé se trouve à la fin de l'article.

Background Appropriate management of esophageal food bolus impactions includes endoscopic evaluation and follow-up for potential underlying esophageal pathology. Patients who present with impactions at night may not receive optimal long-term post-endoscopy care due to patient-, physician-, or system-related factors. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of care for patients who present with food bolus impactions after regular daytime hours. Method We conducted a retrospective, population-based, multi-center cohort study of adult patients undergoing endoscopy for food impaction between 19:00-06:59 from 2016-2018 in the Calgary Health Zone, Canada. Appropriate post-endoscopy care was defined by a composite of a follow-up clinic visit, repeat endoscopy, other appropriate investigations (e.g., manometry), or appropriate medical treatment (e.g., proton pump inhibitor). Predictors of inappropriate care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Result(s) A total of 323 patients underwent an after-hours or overnight endoscopy for food bolus impaction. 25.4% (82/323) of patients did not receive appropriate post-endoscopy care. Predictors of inappropriate care included rural residence (aOR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.18-6.01], p=0.02), first food bolus presentation (aOR 2.38 [95% CI: 1.04-5.44], p=0.04), and absence of a specific pathology during the index procedure (aOR 3.01 [95% CI: 0.97-9.29], p=0.05), suggesting a potential association with clinician cognitive bias. Among patients who were followed, 18.9% (35/185) had a change in the original diagnosis. Image Conclusion(s) One quarter of patients presenting with a food bolus impaction at night do not receive appropriate post-endoscopy care. System-based interventions should target this high-risk population as the diagnosis and management may change with follow-up. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

IntroductionEvidence-based preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative glycemic management may reduce poor surgical outcomes. Previous studies suggest that quality gaps in perioperative glycemic management may be common.Research design and methodsThis retrospective cohort study used administrative health and laboratory data from a single center to estimate quality gaps in perioperative glycemic management in patients with and without diabetes between April 2019 and March 2020. We examined the proportion of patients with preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement, postoperative point-of-care testing (POCT) for glucose, hyperglycemia, and basal bolus insulin regimens. We compared the median length of stay (LOS) in patients with and without postoperative hyperglycemia, adjusted for age and sex.ResultsThere were 6576 patients in our cohort; 1165 (17.8%) had diabetes. Most patients with diabetes had an HbA1c measured prior to surgery (n=697, 59.8%). Postoperatively, 16.9% of patients with diabetes had no POCT monitoring (n=197) and 65.7% had hyperglycemia (n=636). Only 35.9% of patients who received insulin had a basal bolus insulin regimen (n=229). Patients with diabetes who had postoperative hyperglycemia had a longer median LOS compared with those who did not have postoperative hyperglycemia (8.4 days (95% CI 7.5 to 9.4) and 6.7 days (95% CI 6.3 to 7.1), respectively). In patients without diabetes, median LOS was 7.4 days (95% CI 4.4 to 10.4) for those with hyperglycemia and 5.2 days (95% CI 5.1 to 5.4) for those with in-target glucose.ConclusionsQuality gaps in perioperative glycemic management include measurement of blood glucose after surgery and treatment of postoperative hyperglycemia. These gaps may contribute to longer LOS.

Background & Aims: Esophageal food bolus impactions (FBIs) are a common gastrointestinal emergency. Appropriate management includes not only index endoscopy for disimpaction, but also medical follow-up and treatment for the underlying esophageal pathology. We evaluated the appropriateness of post-endoscopy care for patients with FBIs, and assessed patient-, physician- and system-related factors that may contribute to loss to follow-up. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based, multi-center cohort study of all adult patients undergoing endoscopy for FBI in the Calgary Health Zone, Canada from 2016-2018. Appropriate post-endoscopy care was defined by a composite of a clinical or endoscopic follow-up visit, appropriate investigations (e.g., manometry), or therapy (e.g., proton pump inhibitors, endoscopic dilation). Predictors of inappropriate care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 519 patients underwent endoscopy for FBI: 25.2% (131/519) did not receive appropriate post-endoscopy care. Half of patients (55.3%, 287/519) underwent follow-up endoscopy or attended clinic, and amongst this group, 22.3% (64/287) had a change in their initial diagnosis after follow-up, including three new cases of esophageal cancer. Patients in whom a suspected underlying esophageal pathology was not identified at the index endoscopy were 7-fold (adjusted odds ratio 7.28 [95% CI: 4.49-11.78], p<0.001) more likely to receive inappropriate post-endoscopy follow-up and treatment, even after adjusting age, sex, rural residence, timing of endoscopy, weekend presentation, and endoscopic interventions. Conclusions: One quarter of patients presenting with an FBI do not receive appropriate post-endoscopy care. This is strongly associated with failure to identify a potential underlying pathology at index presentation.