It is known that physical coupling between two subjects may be advantageous in joint tasks. However, little is known about how two people mutually exchange information to exploit the coupling. Therefore, we adopted a reversed, novel perspective to the standard one that focuses on the ability of physically coupled subjects to adapt to cooperative contexts that require negotiating a common plan: we investigated how training in pairs on a novel task affects the development of motor skills of each of the interacting partners. The task involved reaching movements in an unstable dynamic environment using a bilateral non-linear elastic tool that could be used bimanually or dyadically. The main result is that training with an expert leads to the greatest performance in the joint task. However, the performance in the individual test is strongly affected by the initial skill level of the partner. Moreover, practicing with a peer rather than an expert appears to be more advantageous for a naive; and motor skills can be transferred to a bimanual context, after training with an expert, only if the non-expert subject had prior experience of the dynamics of the novel task.

In the context of unstable tasks, whenever the dynamics of the interaction are unknown, our ability to control an object depends on the predictability of the sensory feedback generated from the physical coupling at the interface with the object. In the case of physical human-human interaction, the haptic sensory feedback plays a primary role in the construction of a shared motor plan, being the channel for the mutual sharing of intentions. The present work addresses the issue of strategy selection in contexts in which instability is arising both from the environment, i.e. controlling a compliant object subject to nonlinear forces, and from the interaction with a partner, i.e. carrying out a bimanual balancing task in the presence of disturbing force-fields.

Physical interaction between man and machines is increasing the interest of the research as well as the industrial community. It is known that physical coupling between active persons can be beneficial and increase the performance of the dyad compared to an individual. However, the factors that may result in performance benefits are still poorly understood. The aim of this work is to investigate how the different initial skill levels of the interacting partners influence the learning of a stabilization task. Twelve subjects, divided in two groups, trained in couples in a joint stabilization task. In the first group the couples were composed of two naive, while in the second a naive was trained together with an expert. Results show that training with an expert results in the greatest performance in the joint task. However, this benefit is not transferred to the individual when performing the same task bimanually.

Previous works have shown that, when dealing with instabilities in a bimanual manipulation paradigm, humans modulate the stiffness of the arms according to feedforward or feedback mechanisms as a function of the dynamics of the task. The aim of this work is to complement these results getting insights on how the CNS controls the muscles to achieve the stabilization goal in the two aforementioned control strategies. Surface EMG was recorded from 13 muscles of each arm and trunk while three expert subjects performed bimanual balancing of a virtual underactuated tool immersed in an unstable force-field. Results suggest the existence of an intermittent muscle ensemble recruitment that follows two distinct activation patterns, namely synchronous co-contractions and independent activations. The observed EMG patterns were independent of the motor control strategy applied in the task. These findings therefore suggest the existence of separate control strategies for the tool stabilization and the control of hand movements at the muscular level during a bimanual postural task.