In March 2002, a 25-ftls vertical drop test of a composite fuselage section was conducted onto water. The purpose of the test was to obtain experimental data characterizing the structural response of the fuselage section during water impact for comparison with two previous drop tests that were performed onto a rigid surface and soft soil. For the drop test, the fuselage section was configured with ten 100-lb. lead masses, five per side, that were attached to seat rails mounted to the floor. The fuselage section was raised to a height of 10-ft. and dropped vertically into a 15-ft. diameter pool filled to a depth of 3.5-ft. with water. Approximately 70 channels of data were collected during the drop test at a 10-kHz sampling rate. The test data were used to validate crash simulations of the water impact that were developed using the nonlinear, explicit transient dynamic codes, MSC.Dytran and LS-DYNA. The fuselage structure was modeled using shell and solid elements with a Lagrangian mesh, and the water was modeled with both Eulerian and Lagrangian techniques. The fluid-structure interactions were executed using the "fast" general coupling in MSC.Dytran and the Arbitrary Lagrange-Euler (ALE) coupling in LS-DYNA. Additionally, the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) meshless Lagrangian technique was used in LS-DYNA to represent the fluid. The simulation results were correlated with the test data to validate the modeling approach. Additional simulation studies were performed to determine how changes in mesh density, mesh uniformity, fluid viscosity, and failure strain influence the test-analysis correlation.
A composite fuselage concept for light aircraft has been developed to provide improved crashworthiness. The fuselage consists of a relatively rigid upper section, or passenger cabin, including a stiff structural oor and a frangible lower section that encloses the crash energy management structure. The crashworthy performance of the fuselage concept was evaluated through impact testing of a one-fth-scale model fuselage section. The impact design requirement for the scale model fuselage is to achieve a 125-g average oor-level acceleration for a 31-ft/s vertical impact onto a rigid surface. The energy absorption behavior of two different sub oor con gurations was determined through quasi-static crushing tests. For the dynamic evaluation, each sub oor con guration was incorporated into a one-fth-scale model fuselage section, which was dropped from a height of 15 ft to achieve a 31-ft/s vertical velocity at impact. The experimental data demonstrate that the fuselage section with a foam-block sub oor con guration satis ed the impact design requirement. A second drop test was performed to evaluate the energy absorption performance of the fuselage concept for an off-axis impact condition. The experimental data are correlated with analytical predictions from a nite element model developed using the nonlinear, explicit transient dynamic code MSC/DYTRAN.
Comparisons of the impact performance of a 5 ft diameter crashworthy composite fuselage section were investigated for hard surface, soft soil, and water impacts. The fuselage concept, which was originally designed for impacts onto a hard surface only, consisted of a stiff upper cabin, load bearing floor, and an energy absorbing subfloor. Vertical drop tests were performed at 25 ft/s onto concrete, soft soil, and water. Comparisons of the peak acceleration values, pulse durations, and onset rates were evaluated for each test at specific locations on the fuselage. In addition to comparisons of the experimental results, dynamic finite element models were developed to simulate each impact condition. Once validated, these models can be used to evaluate the dynamic behavior of subfloor components for improved crash protection for hard surface, soft soil, and water impacts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.