No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Heart failure (HF) significantly reduces physical capacity and harms the overall functioning. In the end-stage cases of HF, the only options are surgical procedures including left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) implantation and heart transplant. Due to the insufficient number of available organs for transplantation, LVAD are used more and more frequently. Rehabilitation of patients with LVAD is a crucial element of therapy because of long-term immobilization of patients awaiting transplant or heart muscle regeneration. Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of early hospital rehabilitation on exercise tolerance, muscles strength and complex coordination in LVAD patients. Methods The total of 20 LVAD patients were recruited to the study (all male, aged 19–66 years). All patients underwent standard cardiac rehabilitation in the postoperative and medical treatment wards. After the end of hospitalization, patients were admitted to the rehabilitation department for 4–5 weeks. During that period they performed endurance training, conditioning exercises with elements of resistance and coordination exercises. All patients were tested before and after the rehabilitation program using ergospirometry (CPX), 6-MWT, upper and lower limbs muscle strength (30 Second Chair Stand) and complex coordination (Up&Go test). Results A significant increase in the values of most of studied parameters was observed after exercise training in comparison to the results before rehabilitation process (VO2 peak) [ml/kg/min]: 11.1±2.2 vs. 12.5±2.7, p<0.001; Watt: 42.6±12.4 vs. 54.1±13.1, p<0.0001; 6- MWT [m]: 300.1±102.2 vs. 404.8±105.9, p<0.0001; 30 Seconds Chair Stand [number of stands] 8.4±3.3 vs. 11.6±4.8, p<0.0001; Up&Go [sec] 9.0±1.7 vs. 7.1±1.5, p<0.0001; left hand grip strength [kg]: 31.5±8.4 vs. 34.8±8.1, ns; right hand grip strength [kg]: 33.6±11,2 vs. 36.0±9.0, ns. No adverse effects were observed during rehabilitation process. Conclusions Hospital-based rehabilitation is safe and effective in LVAD patients. Rehabilitation after LVAD implantation brings significant benefits in terms of exercise capacity and tolerance, muscle strength and complex coordination in this group of patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): NATIONAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of individual training on the level of physical capacity and echocardiographic parameters in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF), NYHA III and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).Material and methodsThe study included 84 patients with SHF, randomly assigned to one of two groups: with regular training (ICD-Ex) and a control group (ICD-control). The ICD-Ex group participated in a hospital rehabilitation program which after discharge was individually continued for 6 months in an outpatient setting. The ICD-control group participated in a training program during hospitalization, but after discharge did not perform any controlled activities. Prior to discharge, at 6 and 18 months cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX), standard echocardiographic examination and the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) were performed in all patients.ResultsAfter 18 months in the ICD-Ex group most of the CPX parameters improved significantly (VO2 peak, ml/kg/min: 13.0 ±4.1 vs. 15.9 ±6.1, p < 0.0017; VCO2 peak, l/min: 1.14 ±0.34 vs. 1.58 ±0.65, p < 0.0008; Watt: 74.5 ±29.7 vs. 92.6 ±39.1, p < 0.0006; METs 3.72 ±1.81 vs. 4.35 ±1.46, p < 0.0131). In the ICD-control group no significant improvement of any parameter was observed. Left ventricular systolic dimensions remained significantly lower at 18 months only in the ICD-Ex group (49.5 ±11.0 vs. 43.4 ±10.0, p < 0.011). Left ventricular ejection fraction in both groups significantly increased at 6 and 18 months compared to baseline (ICD-Ex: 25.07 ±5.4 vs. 31.4 ±9.2, p < 0.001, vs. 30.9 ±8.9, p < 0.002, ICD-C: 25.1 ±8.3 vs. 29.2 ±7.7, p < 0.012 vs. 30.1 ±9.1, p < 0.005). Distance of the 6-MWT was significantly improved after 6 and 18 months in the ICD-Ex group and was overall longer than in the ICD-control group (491 ±127 vs. 423 ±114 m, p < 0.04).ConclusionsAn individual, 6-month training program, properly controlled in patients with SHF and an implanted ICD, was safe and resulted in a significant improvement of exercise tolerance and capacity and echocardiographic parameters.