With the increasing interest in the utilization of urban airspace for unmanned aerial system (UAS) operations, be it for cargo delivery or passenger transportation, the future city sky could become quite a crowded place if all those visions become reality. In such case, the question of how close two operations could be conducted while sharing an airspace must be answered to ensure the safe and efficient use of the urban airspace. The lateral separation needed to prevent inadvertent intrusion by neighboring tracks is especially important when designing airspace corridors constrained by the urban landscape. This paper documents a series of flight tests conducted in open fields with the goal of assessing the along-track (longitudinal), cross-track (lateral),and altitude (height) deviation under two different flight conditions: operator guided operation within Visual Line of Sight (VLoS), and the waypoint-guided mission analogous to operating Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLoS). The flight test statistics were also compared to the Monte-Carlo based path prediction model that was used in earlier studies for collision prediction. The goal is to determine the Flight Technical Error (FTE) that forms a part of the Total System Error (TSE) for Performance Based Navigation (PBN) of UAS to support the establishment of separation requirements in urban airspace.
The management of collision risk posed by recreational unmanned aerial systems (UAS) intruding into controlled airspace is becoming more critical with the surge in accessibility and popularity of these UAS. Risk mitigation actions that could be taken by the airport operators currently are limited by the lack of reliable UAS detection equipment, which limits their ability to track UAS positions over time and predict the collision risks posed by the UAS. While recent developments in airborne collision prevention of manned aircraft could utilize Markov Decision Process with state probabilities based on historical flight track records and processed using Bayesian Network, this method is not suitable for the off-nominal case of UAS intrusion into controlled airspace. Instead, the prediction of collision risk posed by non-cooperative recreational UAS have to rely on the assumption of worst-case intention, where the UAS aims for the aircraft operating within the aerodrome, and the Reich collision risk model to generate the probable distribution of future UAS positions. This paper documents a series of flight test to simulate such scenario with a UAS operating under visual line of sight condition while aiming for an imaginary three dimensional target in the air. The data was analyzed for the deviation in UAS positions at fixed time interval in the (horizontal) longitudinal and lateral direction, as well as the deviation in altitude. A comparison between the observed deviation and a Monte-Carlo based UAS path prediction following the UAS flight dynamic model were also conducted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.