Background: Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as pelvic pain during menstrual flow in the absence of a pelvic pathology. It is one of the most common gynaecological complaints worldwide and the most common cause of school and work absenteeism among menstruating females. In adolescent students the impact includes reduced attention in class, inability to study at home, school absenteeism among others. Yet these students have to study at the same pace as their peers, raising the concern of whether the problems caused by primary dysmenorrhea have an effect on academic their academic performance. Aim: Determine the prevalence, treatment practices and impact of primary dysmenorrhea on the studies of post-pubertal high school students in Bafoussam. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive and analytic study design using a two-stage sampling method; the first stage was by convenience to choose the school, and the second stage was consecutive to recruit the students. Data was collected using a semi-structured pretested self-report and anonymous questionnaire. Analysis was done using software IBM ® SPSS statistics version 23 for windows. Categorical variables were summarised in to frequencies and percentages while the comparison of categorical variables was done using a Chi-square test, and a p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: our sample size was 898 and the mean age of our respondents (±SD) was 17.6 (±1.6) years. The prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea was 71.9%, with 11.6% mild pain, 52.5% moderate pain and 35.9% severe pain on a visual analogue scale. Over 38% did not attempt pain-relieving measures while others took analgesics, traditional preparations, heat packs among others. Among these students, 39% reported school absenteeism due to pain, other impacts were decreased attention in class, inability to study at home during pain

Introduction: Given that the provision of care to the childbirth process is not purely in the hands of educated and trained midwives, the competency in application of midwifery tools may be inadequate and consequently affect the quality of care. The Partogram is the single most important tool which has been scientifically proven to reduce maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. Though important, many healthcare providers do not use it regularly in the monitoring of labour. Objectives: Our objectives were to determine the attitudes, practices, proportion of parturients monitored using a Partogram and the factors limiting the use of the Partogram by professionals attending to women in labour and delivery (PAWLD) in the Bafut Health District. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out amongst 65 Professionals attending to women in labour and delivery in the Bafut Health District that lasted 6 months. All the data were collected by our self. First through a face to face interview with a questionnaire, secondly with an observational guide used to assess Partograms filled and lastly using delivery registers to obtain the proportion of parturients monitored with a Partogram. The data analysis was done using the statistic software Epi Info version 7 and Microsoft Excel. Results: This study revealed that 47 (72.3%) of participants had good attitudes, 34 (52%) had good practices, 375 (79.3%) parturients were monitored using a Partogram, and the lack of in-service training, low number of staff and poor knowledge on Partogram use were identified as the main limiting

Background: Approximately 830 women die from pregnancy-related conditions daily with 99% of these maternal deaths occurring in low resource countries. Primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) accounts for 25.7% of maternal deaths in Africa. In Cameroon, postpartum hemorrhage remains the leading cause of maternal death, with little information on the primigravidae population compared to multigravida or multiparity. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with postpartum haemorrhage amongst primigravidae women giving birth in two hospitals within the Bamenda Health District. Methods: This study was a multicentric, non-randomized cross-sectional descriptive and analytic study. Of the 221 women interviewed regarding their willingness to participate in the study, 197 consented. Quantification of blood loss was done by visual estimate and with the assistance of the pathfinder international wall chart for visual estimation of blood loss. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS version 23. A P-value of <0.05 used to determine association between variables was considered statistically significant. Results: The prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage in primigravidae was 7.1%. The risk factors of postpartum hemorrhage were: induction of labour (P-value < 0.01), duration of labour (P-value < 0.01), augmentation (P-value < 0.05), mode of delivery (P-value < 0.01), and macrosomia (P-value < 0.01). The main causes of PPH were uterine atony and obstetrical lacerations (P value < 0.01). Management was mostly by the use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures. The main adverse outcomes were shock and severe anaemia, with one case of nearmiss recorded.

Introduction: Maternal asymptomatic colonization with GBS (Group-B Streptococcus) has become a major cause of sepsis, meningitis and encephalopathy in neonates alongside premature births, stillbirths and post-natal infections. Routine screening of pregnant women for GBS carriage and antimicrobial susceptibility are therefore necessary. This study was aimed at evaluating the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and factors associated with GBS colonization in pregnant women at the Regional Hospital Bamenda (RHB). Materials and Methods: Vaginal and rectal swab samples were collected from 121 pregnant women in the 3 rd trimester at the RHB from December 2017 to May 2018. Sociodemographic, obstetric and neonatal history and some clinical parameters were obtained through a questionnaire approach. Cultures for the isolation and identification of GBS from the samples were done and grouping as well as susceptibility testing of GBS isolates was done. Results: The colonisation rates were 5.8% (7), 1.7% (2) and 5.8% (7) for rectal, vaginal and concomitant recto-vaginal carriage. GBS was isolated in the vagina/rectum of 16 participants (13.2% prevalence). Of the 16 GBS strains used for in vitro susceptibility test, no resistance to ampicillin, oxacillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, imipenem, aztreonam and clindamycin was recorded. 6.3% (1) of the strains had intermediate susceptibility to ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Of the isolates examined, 37.5% (6), and 12.5% (2) were respectively sensitive to gentamycin and levofloxacin.