The seasonal food habits of brown bears Ursus arctos were estimated based on the analysis of 266 scats in central Norway and Sweden. Free‐ranging domestic sheep Ovis aries were common in the Norwegian part of the study area, but were not found in the Swedish part. Correction factors were used to correct for differences in digestibility and nutritional value of different foods. Because correction factors for ungulates are difficult to estimate, the results should be interpreted with some caution. In terms of digestible energy, ungulates, mostly carrion, were the most important food in both areas during spring. During summer, ants, forbs, and ungulates (reindeer Rangifer tarandus and moose Alces alces) were the most important food items in the Swedish area, and sheep were most important in the Norwegian area. The autumn diet was dominated by berries in the Swedish area and sheep and berries in the Norwegian area. Among berries, crowberry Empetrum nigrum was the most important species, followed by bilberry Vaccinium myrtiUus in Sweden. The major difference between the Swedish and Norwegian areas was the large consumption of sheep in Norway, which provided protein and lipids, and was associated with a relatively reduced consumption of ants and forbs in summer and berries in the autumn. Based on different ingestion rates among the seasons, we estimated the relative contribution of major foods to total digestible energy. In the Swedish area, bears obtained 44–46 and 14–30% of their total annual energy from berries and ungulates, respectively. The remaining energy was obtained from insects (14–22%, mostly ants) and forbs and graminoids (12–18%, mostly blue sow thistle Cicerbita alpina). In Norway, bears obtained 65–87% of the energy from ungulates (mostly sheep), 6–17% from berries, 5–13% from insects, and 2–6% from forbs and graminoids. To gain weight prior to denning, brown bears in Norway selected lipid‐rich and easily obtainable sheep in summer and autumn. In Sweden, they relied on carbohydrate‐rich berries in autumn.

Preserving of fish species and populations is important whether it is for exploitation or just for conservation. Management of fisheries aim to maintain fishable stocks that are attractive to anglers, and different means are performed. In this study from the River South Rena in southeastern Norway, conducted during 1991–2005, the effects of supportive stocking of hatchery reared brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) from 1996, and bag limit (BL) and catch‐release (CR) practice for the target species brown trout, from 2002, were explored. Effects of supplemental brown trout stocking was not noticeable, except from one year following a year of exceptional high number of stocked fish, actually 41% of the catches, whereas in the following years this proportion remained constant about 10%, and the catches remained high in 2003 and 2004, mainly due to increased angling success rate after BL‐CR introduction.