Microparticles have the potentials to be used for many medical purposes in-side the human body such as drug delivery and other operations. This paper attempts to provide a thorough comparison between five meta-heuristic search algorithms: Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA), Slime Mould Algorithm (SMA), Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA), and Multi-Verse Optimizer (MVO). These approaches were used to calculate the PID controller optimal indicators with the application of different functions, including Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral of Time Multiplied by Square Error (ITSE), Integral Square Time multiplied square Error (ISTES), Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral of Square Time multiplied by square Error (ISTSE), and Integral of Time multiplied by Absolute Error (ITAE). Every method of controlling was presented in a MATLAB Simulink numerical model, and LABVIEW software was used to run the experimental tests. It is observed that the MPA technique achieves the highest values of settling error for both simulation and experimental results among other control approaches, while the SSA approach reduces the settling error by 50% compared to former experiments. The results indicate that SSA is the best method among all approaches and that ISTES is the best choice of PID for optimizing the controlling parameters.
Microparticles have the potentials to be used for many medical purposes in-side the human body such as drug delivery and other operations. This paper offers a comprehensive comparative study of three meta-heuristic search algorithms for controlling the micro-robotics system with a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Harmony Search algorithm (HS) and Ant Lion Optimizer (ALO) are the various techniques that this study adopts. The optimum position control can be obtained by employing the former algorithms with different fitness functions, namely Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral of Time Multiplied by Square Error (ITSE), Integral Square Time multiplied square Error (ISTES), Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral of Square Time multiplied by square Error ( (ISTSE), and Integral of Time multiplied by Absolute Error (ITAE). In a MATLAB Simulink, each control method was presented, while the experimental measurements were tested and operated by the LabVIEW Software. It is observed that the HS technique achieves the highest values of settling error for both simulation and experimental results among other control approaches, while the ALO approach reduces the settling error by 32.5% compared to former experiments. The results indicate that ALO is the best method among all approaches and that ISTES is the best choice of PID for optimizing the controlling parameters.
Micro particles have the potentials to be used for many medical purposes in-side the human body such as drug delivery and other operations. This paper attempts to provide a thorough comparison between five meta-heuristic search algorithms: Arithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA), Artificial Gorilla troop's optimization (GTO), Seagull optimization algorithm (SOA), Parasitism-predation Algorithm (PPA), and hybrid between AOA and GTO (HAOAGTO). These approaches were used to calculate the PID controller optimal indicators with the application of different functions, including Integral Absolute Error (IAE), Integral of Time Multiplied by Square Error (ITSE), Integral Square Time multiplied square Error (ISTES), Integral Square Error (ISE), Integral of Square Time multiplied by square Error ( (ISTSE), and Integral of Time multiplied by Absolute Error (ITAE). Every method of controlling was presented in a MATLAB Simulink numerical model. It is observed that the PPA technique achieves the highest values of best fitness value for simulation results among other control approaches, while the HAOAGTO approach reduces the best fitness function compared to other optimization techniques used. The results indicate that HAOAGTO is the best method among all approaches and that ISTES is the best choice of PID for optimizing the controlling parameters.
The process of tuning the PID controller’s parameters is considered to be a difficult task. Several approaches were developed in the past known as conventional methods. One of these methods is the Ziegler and Nichols that relies on accurate mathematical model of the linear system, but if the system is complex the former method fails to compute the parameters of PID controller. To overcome this problem, recently there exist several techniques based on artificial intelligence such as optimization techniques. The optimization techniques does not require any mathematical model and they are considered to be easy to implement on any system even if it complex, can reach optimal solutions on the parameters. In this study, a new approach to control the position of the micro-robotics system proportional - integral - derivative (PID) controller is designed and a recently developed algorithm based on optimization is known as the sparrow search algorithm (SSA). By using the sparrow search algorithm (SSA), the optimal PID controller parameters were obtained by minimizing a new objective function, which consists of the integral square Time multiplied square Error (ISTES) performance index. The effectiveness of the proposed SSA-based controller was verified by comparisons made with the Sine Cosine algorithm (SCA), and Flower pollination algorithm (FPA) controllers in terms of time and frequency response. Each control technique will be applied to the identified model (simulation results) using MATLAB Simulink and the laboratory setup (experimental results) using LABVIEW software. Finally, the SSA showed the highest performance in time and frequency responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.