Abstract:The strategic European paper "Flightpath 2050" claims dramatic reductions of noise for aviation transport scenarios in 2050: ". . . The perceived noise emission of flying aircraft is reduced by 65%. These are relative to the capabilities of typical new aircraft in 2000. . . ". There is a consensus among experts that these far reaching objectives cannot be accomplished by application of noise reduction technologies at the level of aircraft components only. Comparably drastic claims simultaneously expressed in Flightpath 2050 for carbon dioxide and NOX reduction underline the need for step changes in aircraft technologies and aircraft configurations. New aircraft concepts with entirely different propulsion concepts will emerge, including unconventional power supplies from renewable energy sources, ranging from electric over hybrid to synthetic fuels. Given this foreseen revolution in aircraft technology the question arises, how the noise impact of these new aircraft may be assessed. Within the present contribution, a multi-level, multi-fidelity approach is proposed which enables aircraft noise assessment. It is composed by coupling noise prediction methods at three different levels of detail. On the first level, high fidelity methods for predicting the aeroacoustic behavior of aircraft components (and installations) are required since in the early stages of the development of innovative noise reduction technology test data is not available. The results are transferred to the second level, where radiation patterns of entire conventional and future aircraft concepts are assembled and noise emissions for single aircraft are computed. In the third level, large scale scenarios with many aircraft are considered to accurately predict the noise exposure for receivers on the ground. It is shown that reasonable predictions of the ground noise exposure level may be obtained. Furthermore, even though simplifications and omissions are introduced, it is shown that the method is capable of transferring all relevant physical aspects through the levels.
The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) has recently been used to simulate wave propagation, one of the challenging aspects of wind turbine modeling and simulation. However, standard LB methods suffer from the instability that occurs at low viscosities and from its characteristic lattice uniformity, which results in issues of accuracy and computational efficiency following mesh refinement. The local radial point interpolation cumulant lattice Boltzmann method (LRPIC-LBM) is proposed in this paper to overcome these shortcomings. The LB equation is divided into collision and streaming steps. The collision step is modeled by the cumulant method, one of the stable LB methods at low viscosities. In addition, the streaming step, which is naturally a pure advection equation, is discretized in time and space using the Lax–Wendroff scheme and the local radial point interpolation method (RPIM), a mesh free method. We describe the propagation of planar acoustic waves, including the temporal decay of a standing plane wave and the spatial decay of a planar acoustic pulse. The analysis of these specific benchmark problems has yielded qualitative and quantitative data on acoustic dispersion and dissipation, and their deviation from analytical results demonstrates the accuracy of the method. We found that the LRPIC-LBM replicates the analytical results for different viscosities, and the errors of the fundamental acoustic properties are negligible, even for quite low resolutions. Thus, this method may constitute a useful platform for effectively predicting complex engineering problems such as wind turbine simulations, without parameter dependencies such as the number of points per wavelength Nppw and resolution σ or the detrimental effect caused by the use of coarse grids found in other accurate and stable LB models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.