No abstract

Articles you may be interested inSub-20nm silicon patterning and metal lift-off using thermal scanning probe lithography Reducing the scale of etched nanostructures below the 10 nm range eventually will require an atomic scale understanding of the masks being used in order to maintain exquisite control over both feature size and feature density. Here, the authors demonstrate a method for tracking atomically resolved and controlled structures from initial template definition through final nanostructure metrology, opening up a pathway for top-down atomic control over nanofabrication. First, hydrogen depassivation lithography is performed on hydrogen terminated Si(100) using a scanning tunneling microscope, which spatially defined chemically reactive regions. Next, atomic layer deposition of titanium dioxide produces an etch-resistant hard mask pattern on these regions. Reactive ion etching then transfers the mask pattern onto Si with pattern height of 17 nm, critical dimension of approximately 6 nm, and full-pitch down to 13 nm. The effects of linewidth, template atomic defect density, and line-edge roughness are examined in the context of controlling fabrication with arbitrary feature control, suggesting a possible critical dimension down to 2 nm on 10 nm tall features. A metrology standard is demonstrated, where the atomically resolved mask template is used to determine the size of a nanofabricated sample showing a route to image correction.

The production of spurious dangling bonds during the hydrogen depassivation lithography process on Si(100)-H is studied. It is shown that the number of spurious dangling bonds produced depends on the size of the primary pattern on the surface, not on the electron dose, indicating that the spurious dangling bonds are formed via an interaction of the liberated hydrogen with the surface. It is also shown that repassivation may occur if hydrogen depassivation lithography is performed near an already patterned area. Finally, it is argued that the product of the interaction is a single dangling bond next to a monohydride silicon on a silicon dimer, with a reaction probability much in excess of that previously observed.

Here the microscopic mechanism that leads to the surprising formation of a nanopattern upon methanol reacting with a H-terminated Si (111) surface [Michalak et al., Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 266−271] is reinvestigated from both theory and experiment. First-principles calculations determine the fully OCH 3

In top down nanofabrication research facilities around the world, the direct-write high-resolution patterning tool of choice is overwhelmingly electron beam lithography. Remarkably small features can be written in a variety of polymeric resists [V. R. Manfrinato et al., Nano Lett. 14, 4406 (2014); V. R. Manfrinato, A. Stein, L. Zhang, Y. Nam, K. G. Yager, E. A. Stach, and C. T. Black, Nano Lett. 17, 4562 (2017)]. However, this technology, which in this article the authors will refer to as conventional electron beam lithography (CEBL), is reaching its practical resolution and precision limits [V. R. Manfrinato et al., Nano Lett. 14, 4406 (2014)]. Hydrogen depassivation lithography (HDL) [J. N. Randall, J. W. Lyding, S. Schmucker, J. R. Von Ehr, J. Ballard, R. Saini, and Y. Ding, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 2764 (2009); J. N. Randall, J. B. Ballard, J. W. Lyding, S. Schmucker, J. R. Von Ehr, R. Saini, H. Xu, and Y. Ding, Microelectron. Eng. 87, 955 (2010)] is a different version of electron beam lithography that is not limited in resolution and precision in the way that CEBL is. It uses a cold field emitter, a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) tip, to deliver a small spot of electrons on a Si (100) 2 × 1 H-passivated surface to expose a self-developing resist that is a monolayer of H adsorbed to the Si surface. Subnanometer features [S. Chen, H. Xu, K. E. J. Goh, L. Liu, and J. N. Randall, Nanotechnology 23, 275301 (2012)], and even the removal of single H atoms can be routinely accomplished [M. A. Walsh and M. C. Hersam, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60, 193 (2009)]. It is known that the H desorption process at low biases is a multielectron process [E. Foley, A. Kam, J. Lyding, and P. Avouris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1336 (1998)], but the tunneling distribution of the electrons from the STM tip to the Si surface lattice is not known. The authors have developed a simple model that demonstrates that the combination of two highly nonlinear processes creates a much higher contrast exposure mechanism than CEBL. Currently, HDL has been used almost exclusively on the Si (100) surface and has a limited number of pattern transfer techniques including Si and Ge patterned epitaxy, selective atomic layer deposition of TiO2 followed by reactive ion etching [J. B. Ballard, T. W. Sisson, J. H. G. Owen, W. R. Owen, E. Fuchs, J. Alexander, J. N. Randall, and J. R. Von Ehr, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 31, 06FC01 (2013)], and selective deposition of dopant atoms for quantum devices and materials [Workshop on 2D Quantum MetaMaterials held at NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, April 25–26, 2018, edited by J. Owen and W. P. Kirk]. While the throughput of HDL is very low, going parallel in a big way appears promising [J. N. Randall, J. H. G. Owen, J. Lake, R. Saini, E. Fuchs, M. Mahdavi, S. O. R. Moheimani, and B. C. Schaefer, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 36, 6 (2018)]. However, the most exciting aspect of HDL is its atomic-scale resolution and precision, which is key to nanoscale research. The authors see HDL emerging as the ultimate high-resolution patterning tool in top down nanofabrication research facilities.