No abstract

IMPORTANCEThe optimal management for acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine whether early surgical decompression results in better motor recovery than delayed surgical treatment in patients with acute traumatic incomplete cervical SCI associated with preexisting canal stenosis but without bone injury. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 43 tertiary referral centers in Japan from December 2011 through November 2019. Patients aged 20 to 79 years with motor-incomplete cervical SCI with preexisting canal stenosis (American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale C; without fracture or dislocation) were included. Data were analyzed from September to November 2020. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to undergo surgical treatment within 24 hours after admission or delayed surgical treatment after at least 2 weeks of conservative treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end points were improvement in the mean ASIA motor score, total score of the spinal cord independence measure, and the proportion of patients able to walk independently at 1 year after injury. RESULTS Among 72 randomized patients, 70 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.4] years; age range, 41-79 years; 5 [7%] women and 65 [93%] men) were included in the full analysis population (37 patients assigned to early surgical treatment and 33 patients assigned to delayed surgical treatment).Of these, 56 patients (80%) had data available for at least 1 primary outcome at 1 year. There was no significant difference among primary end points for the early surgical treatment group compared with the delayed surgical treatment group (mean [SD] change in ASIA motor score, 53.7 [14.7] vs 48.5 [19.1]; difference, 5.2; 95% CI, −4.2 to 14.5; P = .27; mean [SD] SCIM total score, 77.9 [22.7] vs 71.3 [27.3]; P = .34; able to walk independently, 21 of 30 patients [70.0%] vs 16 of 26 patients [61.5%]; P = .51). A mixed-design analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in the mean change in ASIA motor scores between the groups (F 1,49 = 4.80; P = .03). The early surgical treatment group, compared with the delayed surgical treatment group, had greater motor scores than the delayed surgical treatment group at 2 weeks (mean [SD] score, 34.2 [18.8] vs 18.9 [20.9]), 3 months (mean [SD] score, 49.1 [15.1] vs 37.2 [20.9]), and 6 months (mean [SD] score, 51.5 [13.9] vs 41.3 [23.4]) after injury. Adverse events were common in both groups (eg, worsening of paralysis, 6 patients vs 6 patients; death, 3 patients vs 3 patients).

No abstract

No abstract

Study Design. A retrospective single-center study. Objective. This study sought to clarify the risk factors and to evaluate the surgical outcome in patients with rapidly progressive cervical spondylotic myelopathy (rp-CSM). Summary of Background Data. CSM is a degenerative spine disease presenting a slow development of myelopathy. Some patients, however, show rapidly progressive neurological deterioration (especially gait disturbances) without any trauma. At present, there is little information about this condition. Methods. We studied 71 consecutive CSM patients (52 men, 19 women) with a mean age of 67.1 years, and the follow-up period was 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups: rp-CSM and chronic-CSM (c-CSM) groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and various clinical differences, including age, sex, comorbidity, the waiting period from symptomatic onset to surgery, cervical range of motion, and intramedullary MR T2-hyperintensity were analyzed, and independent risk factors were determined using a logistic regression analysis. Results. Eighteen of 71 patients (25.4%) were diagnosed with rp-CSM. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, or cervical range of motion. In the rp-CSM group, the preoperative upper/lower extremities and bladder functions were worse, and the waiting period for surgery was shorter (rp-CSM 1.2 mo, c-CSM 25.7 mo). Patients with rp-CSM had a history of cardiovascular event (CVE) (rp-CSM 44.4%, c-CSM 15.1%) and presented with MR T2-hyperintensity (rp-CSM 94.4%, c-CSM 58.5%), especially at the C4/5 disc level. Independent risk factors were a history of CVE (odds ratio = 4.7) and MR T2-hyperintensity (odds ratio  = 12.5). The rp-CSM group showed a better neurological recovery after decompression surgery (the Japanese Orthopaedic Association recovery rate: rp-CSM 64.5%, c-CSM 40.7%). Conclusion. A history of CVE and MR T2-hyperintensity were risk factors for rp-CSM. Despite rapid neurological deterioration, rp-CSM patients showed a good neurological recovery after surgery, and thus indicating that rp-CSM is a reversible condition. Level of Evidence: 4