Clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy is challenging and many patients with Lewy body disease (i.e. Parkinson’s disease or dementia with Lewy bodies) or progressive supranuclear palsy are misdiagnosed as having multiple system atrophy in life. The clinical records of 203 patients with a clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy were reviewed to identify diagnostic pitfalls. We also examined 12 features supporting a diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (red flag features: orofacial dystonia, disproportionate antecollis, camptocormia and/or Pisa syndrome, contractures of hands or feet, inspiratory sighs, severe dysphonia, severe dysarthria, snoring, cold hands and feet, pathological laughter and crying, jerky myoclonic postural/action tremor and polyminimyoclonus) and seven disability milestones (frequent falls, use of urinary catheters, wheelchair dependent, unintelligible speech, cognitive impairment, severe dysphagia, residential care). Of 203 cases, 160 (78.8%) were correctly diagnosed in life and had pathologically confirmed multiple system atrophy. The remaining 21.2% (43/203) had alternative pathological diagnoses including Lewy body disease (12.8%; n = 26), progressive supranuclear palsy (6.4%; n = 13), cerebrovascular diseases (1%; n = 2), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (0.5%; n = 1) and cerebellar degeneration (0.5%; n = 1). More patients with multiple system atrophy developed ataxia, stridor, dysphagia and falls than patients with Lewy body disease; resting tremor, pill-rolling tremor and hallucinations were more frequent in Lewy body disease. Although patients with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy shared several symptoms and signs, ataxia and stridor were more common in multiple system atrophy. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed increased likelihood of multiple system atrophy versus Lewy body disease and progressive supranuclear palsy if a patient developed orthostatic hypotension or urinary incontinence with the requirement for urinary catheters [multiple system atrophy versus Lewy body disease: odds ratio (OR): 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–3.7, P = 0.021; multiple system atrophy versus progressive supranuclear palsy: OR: 11.2, 95% CI: 3.2–39.2, P < 0.01]. Furthermore, autonomic dysfunction within the first 3 years from onset can differentiate multiple system atrophy from progressive supranuclear palsy (multiple system atrophy versus progressive supranuclear palsy: OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.2–9.7, P = 0.023). Multiple system atrophy patients with predominant parkinsonian signs had a higher number of red flag features than patients with Lewy body disease (OR: 8.8, 95% CI: 3.2–24.2, P < 0.01) and progressive supranuclear palsy (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.7–13.6, P < 0.01). The number of red flag features in multiple system atrophy with predominant cerebellar signs was also higher than in Lewy body disease (OR: 7.0, 95% CI: 2.5–19.5, P < 0.01) and progressive supranuclear palsy (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.1–8.9, P = 0.032). Patients with multiple system atrophy had shorter latency to reach use of urinary catheter and longer latency to residential care than progressive supranuclear palsy patients, whereas patients with Lewy body disease took longer to reach multiple milestones than patients with multiple system atrophy. The present study has highlighted features which should improve the ante-mortem diagnostic accuracy of multiple system atrophy.

No abstract

Background: Time in the therapeutic range (TTR) assesses the appropriateness of international normalized ratio of prothrombin time (PT-INR) control during warfarin therapy. We examined the status of and the factors influencing TTR in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results:We enrolled 501 AF patients (mean age, 70±10 years; males 66%; mean CHADS2 score 2.0±1.2) taking warfarin for ≥2 years from 5 prefectures. The PT-INR therapeutic range was set up according to the 2008 Japanese Guideline. TTR was 64±25% for all patients and varied from 56% to 74% with the institution. Time below and above TTR was 31±26% and 5±7%, respectively. TTR was not affected by gender or antiplatelet co-administration. TTR in patients <70 and ≥70 years old was 46±23% and 77±17%, respectively (P<0.0001). TTR in patients with CHADS2 score ≤1 and ≥2 was 59±27% and 68±23%, respectively (P<0.0001). TTR in patients with warfarin doses <2.0, 2.0-4.9, and ≥5.0 mg/day was 72±22%, 63±25% and 48±24%, respectively (all P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed age and warfarin dose as independent predictors of TTR.Conclusions: TTR is generally high in Japan, although it varies with institutions. Most of the time spent out of therapeutic range is below the range. TTR is influenced by age presumably because of the low range recommendation for elderly patients, and by warfarin dose presumably because of physicians' anxiety about the hemorrhage risk. (Circ J 2011; 75: 2087 - 2094

Recent post-mortem studies reported 22–37% of patients with multiple system atrophy can develop cognitive impairment. With the aim of identifying associations between cognitive impairment including memory impairment and α-synuclein pathology, 148 consecutive patients with pathologically proven multiple system atrophy were reviewed. Among them, 118 (79.7%) were reported to have had normal cognition in life, whereas the remaining 30 (20.3%) developed cognitive impairment. Twelve of them had pure frontal-subcortical dysfunction, defined as the presence of executive dysfunction, impaired processing speed, personality change, disinhibition or stereotypy; six had pure memory impairment; and 12 had both types of impairment. Semi-quantitative analysis of neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the hippocampus and parahippocampus revealed a disease duration-related increase in neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the dentate gyrus and cornu ammonis regions 1 and 2 of patients with normal cognition. In contrast, such a correlation with disease duration was not found in patients with cognitive impairment. Compared to the patients with normal cognition, patients with memory impairment (pure memory impairment: n = 6; memory impairment + frontal-subcortical dysfunction: n = 12) had more neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions in the dentate gyrus, cornu ammonis regions 1–4 and entorhinal cortex. In the multiple system atrophy mixed pathological subgroup, which equally affects the striatonigral and olivopontocerebellar systems, patients with the same combination of memory impairment developed more neuronal inclusions in the dentate gyrus, cornu ammonis regions 1, 2 and 4, and the subiculum compared to patients with normal cognition. Using patients with normal cognition (n = 18), frontal-subcortical dysfunction (n = 12) and memory impairment + frontal-subcortical dysfunction (n = 18), we further investigated whether neuronal or glial cytoplasmic inclusions in the prefrontal, temporal and cingulate cortices or the underlying white matter might affect cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy. We also examined topographic correlates of frontal-subcortical dysfunction with other clinical symptoms. Although no differences in neuronal or glial cytoplasmic inclusions were identified between the groups in the regions examined, frontal release signs were found more commonly when patients developed frontal-subcortical dysfunction, indicating the involvement of the frontal–subcortical circuit in the pathogenesis of frontal-subcortical dysfunction. Here, investigating cognitive impairment in the largest number of pathologically proven multiple system atrophy cases described to date, we provide evidence that neuronal cytoplasmic inclusion burden in the hippocampus and parahippocampus is associated with the occurrence of memory impairment in multiple system atrophy. Further investigation is necessary to identify the underlying pathological basis of frontal-subcortical dysfunction in multiple system atrophy.

No abstract