Macrophages become activated by their environment and develop polarized functions: classically activated (M1) macrophages eliminate pathogens but can cause tissue injury, whereas alternatively activated (M2) macrophages promote healing and repair. Mechanisms directing polarized activation, especially in vivo, are not understood completely, and here, we examined the role of SOCS proteins. M2 macrophages activated in vitro or elicited by implanting mice i.p. with the parasitic nematode Brugia malayi display a selective and IL-4-dependent up-regulation of SOCS1 but not SOCS3. Using siRNA-targeted knockdown in BMDM, we reveal that the enhanced SOCS1 is crucial for IL-4-induced M2 characteristics, including a high arginase I:iNOS activity ratio, suppression of T cell proliferation, attenuated responses to IFN-γ/LPS, and curtailed SOCS3 expression. Importantly, SOCS1 was essential in sustaining the enhanced PI3K activity that drives M2 activation, defining a new regulatory mechanism by which SOCS1 controls M2 polarization. By contrast, for M1 macrophages, SOCS1 was not only an important regulator of proinflammatory mediators (IL-6, IL-12, MHC class II, NO), but critically, for M1, we show that SOCS1 also restricted IL-10 secretion and arginase I activity, which otherwise would limit the efficiency of M1 macrophage proinflammatory responses. Together, our results uncover SOCS1, not only as a feedback inhibitor of inflammation but also as a critical molecular switch that tunes key signaling pathways to effectively program different sides of the macrophage balance.

On infiltrating inflamed tissue, macrophages respond to the local microenvironment and develop one of two broad phenotypes: classically activated (M1) macrophages that cause tissue injury and alternatively activated macrophages that promote repair. Understanding how this polarization occurs in vivo is far from complete, and in this study, using a Th1-mediated macrophage-dependent model of acute glomerulonephritis, nephrotoxic nephritis, we examine the role of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)1 and SOCS3. Macrophages in normal kidneys did not express detectable SOCS proteins but those infiltrating inflamed glomeruli were rapidly polarized to express either SOCS1 (27 ± 6%) or SOCS3 (54 ± 12%) but rarely both (10 ± 3%). Rat bone marrow-derived macrophages incubated with IFN-γ or LPS expressed SOCS1 and SOCS3, whereas IL-4 stimulated macrophages expressed SOCS1 exclusively. By contrast, incubation with IFN-γ and LPS together suppressed SOCS1 while uniquely polarizing macrophages to SOCS3 expressing cells. Macrophages in which SOCS3 was knocked down by short interfering RNA responded to IFN-γ and LPS very differently: they had enhanced STAT3 activity; induction of macrophage mannose receptor, arginase and SOCS1; restoration of IL-4 responsiveness that is inhibited in M1 macrophages; and decreased synthesis of inflammatory mediators (NO and IL-6) and costimulatory molecule CD86, demonstrating that SOCS3 is essential for M1 activation. Without it, macrophages develop characteristic alternatively activated markers when exposed to classical activating stimuli. Lastly, increased glomerular IL-4 in nephrotoxic nephritis inhibits infiltrating macrophages from expressing SOCS3 and was associated with attenuated glomerular injury. Consequently, we propose that SOCS3 is essential for development of M1 macrophages in vitro and in vivo.

Angiogenesis assays are an important tool for studying both the mechanisms of angiogenesis and the potential development of therapeutic strategies to modulate neovascularisation. In vivo angiogenesis assays are considered to be the most informative of these but are often expensive, time-consuming and require specialist training to perform. In vitro assays tend to be more rapid, less expensive and easier to interpret. In vitro angiogenesis assays operate on the principle that endothelial cells form tubule-like structures when cultured on a supportive matrix. Assays involving a matrix derived from murine tumours, Matrigel (or a growth factor reduced form of this), are now the most common in vitro tubule formation assays. However, another tubule formation assay has recently been developed in which endothelial cells are co-cultured with fibroblasts. Here, we have used quantitative image analysis to compare the morphological features of tubules formed in the Matrigel assay and this new 'Co-culture' assay, with those of capillaries formed in a microvascular bed in vivo. Tubules formed in standard and growth factor reduced Matrigel assays were short and relatively homogeneous, whereas those formed in the Co-culture assay were significantly more heterogeneous, consisting of both short and long interconnecting tubules that more closely resembled capillaries than Matrigel tubules. Moreover, cells on Matrigel, and to a lesser extent growth factor reduced (GFR) Matrigel, often clumped into large cell aggregates, a feature rarely seen in the Co-culture assay. In addition, we demonstrate that Matrigel stimulates tubule formation by various non-endothelial cell types, suggesting that tubule formation by endothelial cells may not represent true differentiation of this cell type. In summary, the morphology of tubules in the Co-culture assay appears more representative of capillary formation in vivo, than the endothelial cell changes that occur in either form of Matrigel assay.

This report describes a model of angiogenesis which develops in admixtures (co-cultures) of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human diploid fibroblasts of dermal origin from adult patients. The system does not require the addition of further growth factors other than those normally present in endothelial growth medium (EGM), nor matrix proteins, and cell growth and proliferation are allowed to occur in a standard low (2%) concentration of fetal calf serum. Angiogenesis was specifically stimulated in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), resulting in an increased development of structures resembling a microvasculature bed. Alternatively, angiogenesis was inhibited by addition of an excess of neutralising anti-VEGF antibodies, and the anti-angiogenic drugs such as suramin. We briefly show that stimulatory and inhibitory activities can be easily and quickly quantified by image analysis. Tubule formation was confirmed by confocal and electron microscopy, and the development and disposition of these structures within the co-cultures has been analysed immunochemically to show expression of specific endothelial cell determinants, such as PECAM-1. On this and a number of other criteria, the findings validate this in vitro process as a model of in vivo angiogenesis that can be quantified to assay stimulatory and inhibitory agents, signals and drugs.