No abstract

No abstract

Decomposition spaces are a class of function spaces constructed out of "well-behaved" coverings and partitions of unity of a set. The structure of the covering of the set determines the properties of the decomposition space. Besov spaces, shearlet spaces and modulation spaces are well-known decomposition spaces. In this paper we focus on the geometric aspects of decomposition spaces and utilize that these are naturally captured by the large scale properties of a metric space, the covered space, associated to a covering of a set. We demonstrate that decomposition spaces constructed out of quasi-isometric covered spaces have many geometric features in common. The notion of geometric embedding is introduced to formalize the way one decomposition space can be embedded into another decomposition space while respecting the geometric features of the coverings. Some consequences of the large scale approach to decomposition spaces are (i) comparison of coverings of different sets, (ii) study of embeddings of decomposition spaces based on the geometric features and the symmetries of the coverings and (iii) the use of notions from large scale geometry, such as asymptotic dimension or hyperbolicity, to study the properties of decomposition spaces.We draw some consequences of our general investigations for the modulation spaces and for a new class of decomposition spaces based on the special linear group of the Euclidean plane. These results are based on considerations of the large scale properties of stratified Lie groups, locally compact groups and Euclidean spaces, where we utilize the growth type of a group as a large scale invariant.

We define and investigate $$\alpha $$ α -modulation spaces $$M_{p,q}^{s,\alpha }(G)$$ M p , q s , α ( G ) associated to a step two stratified Lie group G with rational structure constants. This is an extension of the Euclidean $$\alpha $$ α -modulation spaces $$M_{p,q}^{s,\alpha }({\mathbb {R}}^n)$$ M p , q s , α ( R n ) that act as intermediate spaces between the modulation spaces ($$\alpha = 0$$ α = 0 ) in time-frequency analysis and the Besov spaces ($$\alpha = 1$$ α = 1 ) in harmonic analysis. We will illustrate that the group structure and dilation structure on G affect the boundary cases $$\alpha = 0,1$$ α = 0 , 1 where the spaces $$M_{p,q}^{s}(G)$$ M p , q s ( G ) and $${\mathcal {B}}_{p,q}^{s}(G)$$ B p , q s ( G ) have non-standard translation and dilation symmetries. Moreover, we show that the spaces $$M_{p,q}^{s,\alpha }(G)$$ M p , q s , α ( G ) are non-trivial and generally distinct from their Euclidean counterparts. Finally, we examine how the metric geometry of the coverings $${\mathcal {Q}}(G)$$ Q ( G ) underlying the $$\alpha = 0$$ α = 0 case $$M_{p,q}^{s}(G)$$ M p , q s ( G ) allows for the existence of geometric embeddings $$\begin{aligned} F:M_{p,q}^{s}({\mathbb {R}}^k) \longrightarrow {} M_{p,q}^{s}(G), \end{aligned}$$ F : M p , q s ( R k ) ⟶ M p , q s ( G ) , as long as k (that only depends on G) is small enough. Our approach naturally gives rise to several open problems that is further elaborated at the end of the paper.

We investigate the wavelet spaces $$\mathcal {W}_{g}(\mathcal {H}_{\pi })\subset L^{2}(G)$$ W g ( H π ) ⊂ L 2 ( G ) arising from square integrable representations $$\pi :G \rightarrow \mathcal {U}(\mathcal {H}_{\pi })$$ π : G → U ( H π ) of a locally compact group G. We show that the wavelet spaces are rigid in the sense that non-trivial intersection between them imposes strong restrictions. Moreover, we use this to derive consequences for wavelet transforms related to convexity and functions of positive type. Motivated by the reproducing kernel Hilbert space structure of wavelet spaces we examine an interpolation problem. In the setting of time–frequency analysis, this problem turns out to be equivalent to the HRT-conjecture. Finally, we consider the problem of whether all the wavelet spaces $$\mathcal {W}_{g}(\mathcal {H}_{\pi })$$ W g ( H π ) of a locally compact group G collectively exhaust the ambient space $$L^{2}(G)$$ L 2 ( G ) . We show that the answer is affirmative for compact groups, while negative for the reduced Heisenberg group.