This study aimed to assess kinematic and kinetic changes in front crawl with various stroke frequency (SF) conditions to investigate why swimming velocity (SV) does not increase above a certain SF (SFmax). Eight male swimmers performed 20 m front crawl four times. The first trial involved maximal effort, whereas SF was controlled during the next three trials. The instructed SFs were 100 (T100%), 110 (T110%), and 120% (T120%) of the SFmax. Through pressure measurement and underwater motion analysis, hand propulsive force (calculated by the difference between the palm and dorsal pressure value and the hand area) and the angle of attack of the hand were quantified, and differences between trials were assessed by a repeated-measures ANOVA. There was no difference in SV between the conditions, while the angle of attack during the latter half of the underwater stroke at T120% was smaller by 25.7% compared with T100% (p = 0.007). The lower angle of attack induced a lower pressure value on the palm that consequently caused a smaller hand propulsive force at T120% than T100% (p = 0.026).Therefore, the decrease in the angle of attack must be minimised to maintain the hand propulsive force.

No abstract

This study investigates the reliability and validity of the estimation of the hydrodynamic forces during eggbeater kicking (a water-treading technique) by pressure distribution analysis (PDA). Our PDA procedure is very similar to that used in a previous study concerning breaststroke kicking (Tsunokawa et al., 2015). In this method, the force estimation is limited to a particular part of the body. However, unlike previous analyses, the PDA method obtains dynamic fluid forces under unsteady flow conditions without requiring cumbersome motion analysis in water. Twelve participants completed the eggbeater kicking activity under four load conditions (0, 1, 2 and 3 weights), and the hydrodynamic forces acting on their right foot are detected by the pressure sensors. To confirm the reliability of our PDA using successive tests, five participants are additionally made to complete the activity under a no-load condition. Further, the PDA is validated in a linear regression analysis of the mean resultant force calculated using the PDA method versus the applied vertical load. The reliability evaluation yields a high degree of coincidence (r = 0.99) and a mean effort of 4.1%. In the validity test, the net vertical loads are significantly correlated with the estimated forces [coefficient of determination (r2 = 0.91–1.00)]. Therefore, the PDA method is a reliable and valid estimator of eggbeater kicking.

Kinematic and kinetic parameters to identify water polo players' eggbeater kick techniquesThis study aimed to clarify the kinematic and kinetic parameters that identify the technical differences in the eggbeater kick. Twelve water polo players performed the eggbeater kick, and its kinematics were recorded by a motion capture system.Pressure distributions around the feet were measured by sixteen pressure sensors attached to the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the feet, from which the resultant fluid force acting on the feet and the vertical component of the force (i.e., propulsive force) were estimated. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (including post hoc test) results showed that the pressure difference, due to negative pressure on the dorsal side of the foot, around the first toe was significantly larger than the other foot segments (difference of up to 7 kN/m 2 , P < 0.01). Moreover, cluster analysis (including Fisher information) results showed that the kinetic (fluid force and pressure) data had a major influence on clustering; the highest Fisher information was 10.42 for the mean propulsive force. Among the kinematic foot parameters, the influence of the foot angle data on clustering was large, suggesting its importance as a technical parameter of the eggbeater kick in relation to the kinetic data.

No abstract