Background and objective
In Japan, the residue definition for fosetyl-Al was “sum of fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid expressed as fosetyl-Al” and its current provisional MRL in cereals was under review. For establishment and enforcement of fosetyl-Al MRL in cereals, a new analytical method for fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid in cereals should be developed and validated.
Methods
The new method involved water extraction, clean-up using tandem cation- and anion-exchange mini-columns, and determination by LC-MS/MS. It was validated in single laboratory and multiple laboratories. Using the method, 41 samples of rice, wheat and barley were analyzed.
Results
In the multiple-laboratory validation: repeatability and reproducibility for three concentrations of fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid were in ranges of 4.8–20% and 5.9–34%; calculated sum of fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid, expressed as fosetyl-Al, showed good recoveries; linearity was observed for fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid in ranges of 0.005–0.4 and 0.025–2.0 mg/kg; and specificity was sufficient. The method was verified for rice matrices. In 41 samples, phosphonic acid was detected up to 0.2 mg/kg while fosetyl was not.
Conclusion
The method was successfully validated with high precision, accuracy, linearity, and specificity and capable of analyzing fosetyl-Al and phosphonic acid with the practical LOQ of 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg. The LOQs and concentrations of phosphonic acid in samples indicate that a potential MRL would be 0.5 mg/kg for fosetyl-Al in cereals.
Highlights
The validated method was simpler than many methods and did not require derivatization or matrix matched or isotopically labeled internal standards.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.