BackgroundFew patients survive after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and any measure that improve circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is beneficial. Animal studies support that resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation might benefit patients suffering from out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, but human data are scarce.Methods and ResultsWe performed an observational study at the helicopter emergency medical service in Trondheim (Norway) to assess the feasibility and safety of establishing REBOA in patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. All patients received advanced cardiac life support during the procedure. End‐tidal CO 2 was measured before and after REBOA placement as a proxy measure of central circulation. A safety‐monitoring program assessed if the procedure interfered with the quality of advanced cardiac life support. REBOA was initiated in 10 patients. The mean age was 63 years (range 50–74 years) and 7 patients were men. The REBOA procedure was successful in all cases, with 80% success rate on first cannulation attempt. Mean procedural time was 11.7 minutes (SD 3.2, range 8–16). Mean end‐tidal CO 2 increased by 1.75 kPa after 60 seconds compared with baseline (P<0.001). Six patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation (60%), 3 patients were admitted to hospital, and 1 patient survived past 30 days. The safety‐monitoring program identified no negative influence on the advanced cardiac life support quality.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that REBOA is feasible during non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. The REBOA procedure did not interfere with the quality of the advanced cardiac life support. The significant increase in end‐tidal CO 2 after occlusion suggests improved organ circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03534011.

Background Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be an adjunct treatment to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Aortic occlusion may increase aortic pressure and increase the coronary perfusion pressure and the cerebral blood flow. Peripheral arterial blood pressure is often measured during or after CPR, however, changes in peripheral blood pressure after aortic occlusion is insufficiently described. This study aimed to assess changes in peripheral arterial blood pressure after REBOA in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest. Methods A prospective observational study performed at the helicopter emergency medical service in Trondheim (Norway). Eligible patients received REBOA as adjunct treatment to advanced cardiac life support. Peripheral invasive arterial blood pressure and end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) was measured before and after aortic occlusion. Differences in arterial blood pressures and EtCO2 before and after occlusion was analysed with Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Results Five patients were included to the study. The median REBOA procedural time was 11 min and median time from dispatch to aortic occlusion was 50 min. Two patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation. EtCO2 increased significantly 60 s after occlusion, by a mean of 1.16 kPa (p = 0.043). Before occlusion the arterial pressure in the compression phase were 43.2 (range 12–112) mmHg, the mean pressure 18.6 (range 4–27) mmHg and pressure in the relaxation phase 7.8 (range − 7 – 22) mmHg. After aortic occlusion the corresponding pressures were 114.8 (range 23–241) mmHg, 44.6 (range 15–87) mmHg and 14.8 (range 0–29) mmHg. The arterial pressures were significant different in the compression phase and as mean pressure (p = 0.043 and p = 0.043, respectively) and not significant in the relaxation phase (p = 0.223). Conclusion This study is, to our knowledge, the first to assess the peripheral invasive arterial blood pressure response to aortic occlusion during CPR in the pre-hospital setting. REBOA application during CPR is associated with a significantly increase in peripheral artery pressures. This likely indicates improved central aortic blood pressure and warrants studies with simultaneous peripheral and central blood pressure measurement during aortic occlusion. Trial registration The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03534011).

BackgroundCall taker triage of calls to the 112 emergency number, can be error prone because rapid decisions must be made based on limited information. Here we investigated the preventability and common characteristics of same-day deaths among patients who called 112 and were not assigned an ambulance with lights and sirens by the Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC).MethodsAn audit was performed by an external panel of experienced prehospital consultant anaesthesiologists. The panel focused exclusively on the role of the EMCC, assessing whether same-day deaths among 112 callers could have been prevented if the EMCC had assessed the situations as highly urgent. The panels’ assessments were based on review of patient charts and voice-log recordings of 112 calls. All patient related material was reviewed by the audit panel and all cases where then scored as preventable, potentially preventable or non-preventable during a two day meeting. The study setting was three of five regions in Denmark with a combined population of 4,182,613 inhabitants, which equals 75% of the Danish population. The study period was 18 months, from mid-2011 to the end of 2012.ResultsLinkage of prospectively collected EMCC data with population-based registries resulted in the identification of 94,488 non-high-acuity 112 callers. Among these callers, 152 (0.16% of all) died on the same day as the corresponding 112 call, and were included in this study. The mean age of included patients was 74.4 years (range, 31–100 years) and 45.4% were female. The audit panel found no definitively preventable deaths; however, 18 (11.8%) of the analysed same-day deaths (0.02% of all non-high-acuity callers) were found to be potentially preventable. In 13 of these 18 cases, the dispatch protocol was either not used or not used correctly.ConclusionSame-day death rarely occurred among 112 callers whose situations were assessed as not highly urgent. No same-day deaths were found to be definitively preventable by a different EMCC call assessment, but a minority of same-day deaths could potentially have been prevented with more accurate triage. Better adherence with dispatch protocol could improve the safety of the dispatch process.

No abstract

Introduction: The proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge after out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low and any measure that may improve circulation to vital organs during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is beneficial. The use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) will redistribute cardiac output to the organs proximal to the occlusion. Animal studies supports that aortic occlusion during CPR might benefit patients suffering from OHCA, but human data are scarce. Methods: We performed an observational study at the helicopter emergency medical service in Trondheim (Norway) to assess the feasibility and safety of establishing REBOA in OHCA patients. The femoral artery was identified by ultrasound and a REBOA catheter was placed in the thoracic aorta. All patients received advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) during the procedure. REBOA eligibility, procedural success and time intervals were registered. A safety monitoring program was conducted to ensure that the procedure did not interfere with the quality of ACLS. Results: REBOA was initiated in ten of 98 OHCA patients. The mean age was 63 years (55-71) and 7 were male. The REBOA procedure was successful in all cases (100%), with 80% success rate on first cannulation attempt. Mean REBOA procedural time was 11,7 minutes (8-16, SD 3,2). End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) increased by a mean of 1.9 kPa at 60 seconds after inflation compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Six of 10 patients (60%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation, 3 (30%) was admitted to hospital. 30-day survival was 10%. The mean width of the femoral artery and vein during CPR was 5,9 mm (3,6 - 7,4, SD 1,2) and 9,4 mm (5,0 - 12,9, SD 2,9), respectively. The safety monitoring group identified no negative influence on the ACLS quality. Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the pre-hospital use of REBOA in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest. The REBOA procedure does not interfere with the quality of the ACLS. REBOA is a feasible adjunct treatment in OHCA. The significant increase in EtCO2 after occlusion suggests improved organ circulation during CPR.