D Di if ff fe er re en nc ce es s i in n a ai ir rw wa ay y r re es sp po on ns si iv ve en ne es ss s b be et tw we ee en n c ch hi il ld dr re en n a an nd d a ad du ul lt ts s l li iv vi in ng g i in n t th he e s sa am me e e en nv vi ir ro on nm me en nt t: : a an n e ep pi id de em mi io ol lo og gi ic ca al l s st tu ud dy y i in n t tw wo o r re eg gi io on ns s o of f N Ne ew w S So ou ut th h W Wa al le es s In winter 1991 and 1992, we studied two large random samples of children living in two different regions; and, three months later, we conducted a study of adults who lived with enrolled children. A total of 805 children and 814 adults attended in Lismore, and 850 children and 711 adults in Wagga Wagga. Questionnaires were used to measure symptom history, histamine inhalation challenge to measure airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and skin-prick tests to measure allergy.There was a higher prevalence of asthma in children than in adults: recent wheeze was 1.5 times higher; asthma medication use was 1.5 times higher; diagnosed asthma was 1.6 times higher; and AHR was two times higher. Current asthma (AHR and recent wheeze) was 9.5-11.3% in children and 5.4-5.6% in adults. These differences were statistically significant. In both regions, airway responsiveness was more severe in children who were sensitized to common allergens than in similarly sensitized adults.These results suggests that airways can develop protective mechanisms with age, or that recent environmental changes in factors such as allergen levels, diet or treatment practices have led to immunological changes and to incresed airway responsiveness in this generation of children.

No abstract

In epidemiological studies, defining asthma as the presence of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) plus recent symptoms leaves two groups of subjects whose clinical significance is unclear: those with asymptomatic AHR, and those with symptoms only. The aim of the study was to determine whether subjects with symptoms only differ from the normal and asthmatic groups in the perception of airway obstruction. Six hundred and ninety seven adults completed a questionnaire of symptoms and underwent bronchial challenge with histamine to induce airway obstruction. Recent symptoms included wheeze and morning chest tightness in the last 12 months. AHR was defined as a provoking dose of histamine causing > or = 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20FEV1) <3.9 micromol. At the end of the challenge test, subjects who felt wheezy or tight in the chest marked a value from 0 to 10 on a modified Borg scale, to describe the severity of the sensation. Subjects with asymptomatic AHR did not differ significantly from subjects with AHR plus recent symptoms (current asthma) either in the mean fall in FEV1 or in the median Borg score. In subjects with symptoms only, the mean Borg score was not significantly different from that of the asthmatic subjects, although mean fall in FEV1 differed significantly (p<0.0001). In subjects with symptoms only, chest tightness correlated significantly with the fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) (p= 0.011), but not with the fall in FEV1. Subjects with asymptomatic airways hyperresponsiveness were not poor perceivers of airway narrowing, but may underreport their symptoms. Subjects with symptoms only may have enhanced perception of small changes in lung function, particularly in forced vital capacity.