No abstract

Infrastructure projects are expected to deliver positive economic and social impact to the community. However, the model to analyze the economic and social impact is still limited. Therefore, this study aims to develop an economic and social impact model to be used for study the impact of infrastructure projects. The research focuses on several case studies of infrastructure projects which guaranteed by Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF) both PPP (Public-Private-Partnership) Scheme and non-PPP Scheme on telco, water, tourism Sector. These sectors are believed to represented the major infrastructure development that cover both local, national, and international perspectives. The analytical method used to measure economic impacts from infrastructure development is a quantitative approach by using following attributes: Sectoral Economic Analysis, Potential Economic Analysis, Growth Accounting, Input-Output Table Analysis, and Statistical Forecasting. While, to analyse the social impact of infrastructure development, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used by In-depth Interview through questionnaire filling technique and Social Impact Assessment (SIA) method. In addition, this study also used legal approach method. The results show various economic impacts of project investment development, both in terms of potential and realization. Meanwhile, in terms of social impacts, there are various community responses to the realization of project development.

<p>Agricultural land has decreased the impact on farmers in meeting their needs. The transition to agriculture complicates industry in its effort to meet the needs of farmers. Another issue, climate change will disrupt plant crops that will result in inefficient farming. Farming inefficiencies are a reason for farmers to diversify. This study was based on a micro data survey data of agricultural enterprise household income in the Regencies / Cities of West Java on a household level. Limits of household income diversification of farming is when the household has to venture outside the agricultural sector or one of the cores and the sources of income comes from salaries / wages of laborers / employees outside the agricultural sector. The results showed that with the increasing age of the household head the diversity decreases, the higher the education of the head of household the more it encourages the diversification of income, the more the additional land area increases diversification, the easier access to credit for adding revenue diversification, increasing the income of farmers that tend not to diversify, the more houses and stairs in school which support farmers to diversify, the more productive the household income lowers with diversification.</p><p><br />JEL Classification: D31, O12, O13<br />Keywords: Climate Change, Diversify, Diversity of Income, Farming, Inefficiency</p>