The roles of ethnicity and migration in determining the size of human prostate zones during midlife were explored. Prostate size was measured by planimetric ultrasound in 163 men residing in Sydney who were either Australian non-Chinese (AR; n = 116) or Chinese migrants (ACM; n = 47) and had lived in Australia for a median of 7.3 yr (range, 0.2-25 yr). These were compared with Chinese men residing in China (CR; n = 210). Central and total prostate volumes were estimated by a single observer using the same equipment at both sites. After adjustment for age, central and total prostate volumes were significantly smaller, and plasma prostate-specific antigen and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentrations and International Prostate Syndrome Scores were significantly lower, in CR compared with either ACM or AR, whereas the scores of the latter two groups were similar. Almost all of the population difference in total prostate volumes could be accounted for by differences in central prostate volumes. The strongest correlates of age-adjusted prostate volume were prostate-specific antigen and DHT, the latter presumably reflecting the quantitative importance of prostatic stromal type II 5alpha-reductase activity to circulating DHT concentrations. Sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations were significantly higher in CR and significantly lower in ACM compared with those in AR, but the significance of these observations is unclear. These findings highlight the importance of the central zone of the prostate as well as provide evidence for an environmental factor influencing prostate growth. This factor operates over a relatively short time period compared with the evolution of prostate disease. Hence, this study provides evidence that ethnicity and geographical factors, such as migration, can influence the growth of the normal human prostate during midlife and may facilitate future studies of the origins and pathogenesis of human prostate disease.

Purpose of review Short stature is a common clinical manifestation in children. Yet, a cause is often unidentifiable in the majority of children with short stature by a routine screening approach. The purpose of this review is to describe the optimal genetic approach for evaluating short stature, challenges of genetic testing, and recent advances in genetic testing for short stature. Recent findings Genetic testing, such as karyotype, chromosomal microarray, targeted gene sequencing, or exome sequencing, has served to identify the underlying genetic causes of short stature. When determining which short stature patient would benefit from genetic evaluation, it is important to consider whether the patient would have a single identifiable genetic cause. Specific diagnoses permit clinicians to predict responses to growth hormone treatment, to understand the phenotypic spectrum, and to understand any associated co-morbidities. Summary The continued progress in the field of genetics and enhanced capabilities provided by genetic testing methods expands the ability of physicians to evaluate children with short stature for underlying genetic defects. Continued effort is needed to elaborate new genetic causes of linear growth disorders, therefore, we expand the list of known genes for short stature, which will subsequently increase the rate of genetic diagnosis for children with short stature.

Among mammalian species, skeletal structures vary greatly in size and shape, leading to a dramatic variety of body sizes and proportions. How different bones grow to different lengths, whether among different species, different individuals of the same species, or even in different anatomical parts of our the body, has always been a fascinating subject of research in biology and physiology. In the current review, we focus on some of the recent advances in the field and discuss how these provided important new insights into the mechanisms regulating bone length and skeletal proportions.