Toxic neuropathy represents an important clinical problem in the use of the chemotherapeutic substances Taxol and thalidomide. Sensory neuropathy has a high incidence, lacks an effective treatment and is the dose-limiting factor for these drugs. The pathogenic basis of these neuropathies is unknown. We investigated the hypothesis that the experimental toxic neuropathies from Taxol and thalidomide results from destruction of vasa nervorum and can be reversed by the administration of an angiogenic cytokine. In animal models of Taxol- and thalidomide-induced neuropathy, nerve blood flow has been attenuated and the number of vasa nervorum has been reduced. Intramuscular gene transfer of naked plasmid DNA encoding VEGF-1 administered in parallel with Taxol injections completely inhibited deterioration of nerve function and diminution of the peripheral nerve vasculature. Gene therapy in animals with established Taxol- or thalidomide-induced neuropathies resulted in recovery of vascularity and improved nerve electrophysiology. These findings implicate microvascular damage as the basis for toxic neuropathy and suggest that angiogenic growth factors may constitute a novel treatment for this disorder.

The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework provides a practical means for organizing scientific knowledge that can be used to infer cause-effect relationships between stressor events and toxicity outcomes in intact organisms. It has reached wide acceptance as a tool to aid chemical safety assessment and regulatory toxicology by supporting a systematic way of predicting adverse health outcomes based on accumulated mechanistic knowledge. A major challenge for broader application of the AOP concept in regulatory toxicology, however, has been developing robust AOPs to a level where they are peer-reviewed and accepted. This is because the amount of work required to substantiate the modular units of a complete AOP is considerable, to the point where it can take years from start to finish. To help alleviate this bottleneck, we propose a more pragmatic approach to AOP development whereby the focus becomes on smaller blocks. First, we argue that the key event relationship (KER) should be formally recognized as the core building block of knowledge assembly within the AOP-KB, albeit framing them within full AOPs to ensure regulatory utility. Second, we argue that KERs should be developed using systematic review approaches, but only in cases where the underlying concept does not build on what is considered canonical knowledge. In cases where knowledge is considered canonical, rigorous systematic review approaches should not be required. It is our hope that these approaches will contribute to increasing the pace at which the AOP-KB is populated with AOPs with utility for chemical safety assessors and regulators.

No abstract