It was previously reported that subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) are more vulnerable to several bacterial or viral infections. In the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is reasonable to wonder whether DM is a risk factor for COVID-19 infection, too. It is not yet clear whether DM increases the risk for contracting COVID-19 infection or not. However, patients with DM when infected are more likely to develop severe or even fatal COVID-19 disease course than patients without DM. Certain characteristics of DM patients may also deteriorate prognosis. On the other hand, hyperglycemia per se is related to unfavorable outcomes, and the risk may be higher for COVID-19 subjects without pre-existing DM. In addition, individuals with DM may experience prolonged symptoms, need readmission, or develop complications such as mucormycosis long after recovery from COVID-19; close follow-up is hence necessary in some selected cases. We here present a narrative review of the literature in order to set light into the relationship between COVID-19 infection and DM/hyperglycemia.

Background: Sex hormones influence lipoprotein metabolism; whether the hormonal fluctuation during normal menstrual cycle has impact on non-fasting lipids remains unclear. Objective: To examine for differences in postprandial triglyceride, apolipoprotein B (ApoB) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) concentrations using a standardized fat tolerance test during the 2 menstrual cycle phases. Methods: We enrolled 25 healthy, menstruating women. Each of them underwent a fat tolerance test during the 2 phases of the menstrual cycle. Blood samples were collected at baseline and up to 6 h postprandially. Differences in serum triglycerides, ApoB and non-HDL-C between the 2 phases were assessed. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC) was calculated. Reproducibility of the measurements was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Serum triglyceride concentrations increased postprandially in both phases and the values were higher during the follicular compared with the luteal phase; however, the overall triglyceride response expressed as iAUC [median value (interquartile range)] did not differ between the follicular and the luteal phase [54.0 (-26.5, 107.0) and 48.0 (6.0, 114.5) mg x h/dl, respectively, p=0.64]. Serum ApoB concentrations did not increase postprandially and the overall ApoB response was not different between the 2 phases. Non-HDL-C concentrations changed postprandially, but the overall response was not different between the 2 phases of the menstrual cycle. Reproducibility of the measurements was moderate: ICC 0.689-0.848 for triglycerides, 0.721-0.771 for ApoB, 0.457-0.867 for non-HDL-C, and %CV >8 for all parameters. Conclusion: Serum triglyceride levels were higher during the follicular compared with the luteal phase after standardized meal consumption, but the overall postprandial triglyceride response did not differ between the 2 phases. Postprandial ApoB and non-HDL-C serum concentrations were not affected by the menstrual cycle.

No abstract