OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with testing for and diagnosis of trichomoniasis in pregnancy and to describe patterns of treatment and tests of reinfection or persistence. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered from July 2016 to June 2018 at one institution. Testing for Trichomonas vaginalis infection was done by wet mount microscopy or by nucleic acid amplification testing for routine prenatal testing or symptomatic visits. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with testing for trichomoniasis and testing positive in pregnancy. Treatment and re-testing patterns also were assessed. RESULTS: Among 3,265 pregnant women, 2,489 (76%) were tested for T vaginalis infection. Of the total sample, 1,808 (55%) were tested by wet mount microscopy, 1,661 (51%) by nucleic acid amplification testing, and 980 (30%) by both modalities. The sensitivity for microscopy compared with nucleic acid amplification testing was 26%, with a specificity of 99%. Factors associated with increased likelihood of being tested included younger age (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.99–1.00) and bacterial vaginosis (aRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01–1.37). Prevalence of trichomoniasis was 15% among those tested by any modality (wet mount or nucleic acid amplification testing). Risk factors for trichomoniasis included younger age (aRR 0.97, P<.01), being of black race (aRR 2.62, P<.01), abnormal vaginal discharge (aRR 1.45, P<.01), and chlamydia during the current pregnancy (aRR 1.70, P<.01). Women diagnosed by microscopy had a shorter time to treatment compared with those diagnosed by nucleic acid amplification testing. Most (75%) women with positive infections had a test of reinfection; 29% of these were positive. Bacterial vaginosis was associated with decreased risk of a positive test of reinfection. CONCLUSION: Although testing for and treatment of trichomoniasis during pregnancy is not routinely recommended, the high burden of infection among some pregnant women demonstrates a need to further understand patterns of T vaginalis testing and infection. Opportunities exist for improving timely treatment of trichomoniasis and test of reinfection.
Background Vaccination is the primary strategy to reduce influenza burden. Influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) can vary annually depending on circulating strains. Methods We used a test-negative case-control study design to estimate influenza VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations among children (6 months-17 years) across 5 influenza seasons in Atlanta, Georgia from 2012-13 to 2016-17.Influenza-positive cases were randomly matched to test-negative controls based on age and influenza season in a 1:1 ratio. We used logistic regression models to compare odds ratios (OR) of vaccination in cases to controls. We calculated VE as [100% x (1-adjusted OR)] and computed 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the estimates. Results We identified 14,596 hospitalizations of children who were tested for influenza using multiplex respiratory molecular panel; influenza infection was detected in 1,017 (7.0%). After exclusions, we included 512 influenza-positive cases and 512 influenza-negative controls; median age was 5.9 years (IQR 2.7-10.3); 497 (48.5%) were female, 567 (55.4%) were non-Hispanic Black and 654 (63.9%) children were unvaccinated. Influenza A accounted for 370 (72.3%) of 512 cases and predominated during all five seasons. The adjusted VE against influenza-related hospitalizations during 2012-13 to 2016-17 was 51.3% (95% CI 34.8-63.6%) and varied by season. Influenza VE was 54.7% (95% CI 37.4-67.3%) for influenza A and 37.1% (95% CI 2.3–59.5%) for influenza B. Conclusions Influenza vaccination decreased the risk of influenza-related pediatric hospitalizations by >50% across five influenza seasons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.