No abstract

The use of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is investigated in ulcer management because it provides a healing milieu rich in growth factors and cytokines. Although crucial, the relevance of secondary dressings is under-researched and no data support the use of any particular dressing in preference to another. We assessed the properties of different dressing categories, including alginates, hydrocolloids, foams, hydrofibers, films, meshes and gauzes, in terms of affinity for PRF, releasate management (retention/extrusion) and the kinetics of cytokine release as well as the influence of each combination product, [PRF + dressing], on dermal cell behaviour, aiming to provide useful information for choosing the most adequate dressing for each particular patient. Active dressings including alginates, hydrofibers, foams and hydrocolloids blend with PRF, creating a diverse combination of products with different performances. Alginate and hydrofiber showed the highest affinity but moderate retention of releasate, without interfering with cell functions. Instead, the foam sequestered the releasate and hindered the release of growth factors, thereby compromising cell activities. Film and mesh presented very poor releasate retention and performed similarly to PRF by itself. Affinity index and releasate management explained 79% of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB) concentration variability, p < 0.001. Cell proliferation depended on the ability of the combination product to retain/release supernatant, PDGF-BB concentration and cell adhesion R 2 = 0.91, p = 0.014.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a new antioxidant therapy for the treatment of complex neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Method: A prospective case series study has been conducted in patients with complex neuroischaemic DFUs after transmetatarsal amputation. DFUs were locally treated with an antioxidant dressing twice a week for the first two weeks, and then once a week until the end of the study or complete wound closure. Patients were followed-up for eight weeks and assessed weekly to analyse wound outcome. Primary outcomes were the wound closure ratio and percentage of granulation tissue; secondary outcomes were parameters related to wound management, namely, presence of non-viable tissue in the wound bed, levels of maceration and exudates, presence of erythema and pain. Results: A total of 20 patients were included with a mean baseline wound area of 20.4cm2. At 8 weeks, the mean reduction in wound area was 88.1% (p<0.0001) and complete closure was observed in 33% of cases. In addition, there was a mean increase of 94.7% in granulation tissue in the wound bed (p<0.0001). Furthermore, the therapy was associated with a significant percentage reduction in wounds with non-viable tissue, good exudate management, and the maintenance of low levels of maceration, erythema and pain. Conclusion: The new antioxidant therapy was associated with good clinical outcomes in large hard-to-heal neuroischaemic DFUs, with significant wound area reduction and granulation tissue formation. The therapy was also found to be safe and perform well from a practical perspective.