The BLM gene belongs to the RecQ helicase family and has been implicated in the maintenance of genomic stability. Its homozygous germline inactivation causes Bloom syndrome, a severe genetic disorder characterized by growth retardation, impaired fertility and highly elevated cancer risk. We hypothesized that BLM is a candidate gene for breast cancer (BC) predisposition. Sequencing of its entire coding region in 95 genetically enriched Russian BC patients identified two heterozygous carriers of the c.1642 C>T (Q548X) mutation. The extended study revealed this allele in 17/1,498 (1.1%) BC cases vs. 2/1,093 (0.2%) healthy women (p 5 0.004). There was a suggestion that BLM mutations were more common in patients reporting first-degree family history of BC (6/251 (2.4%) vs. 11/1,247 (0.9%), p 5 0.05), early-onset cases (12/762 (1.6%) vs. 5/736 (0.7%), p 5 0.14) and women with bilateral appearance of the disease (2/122 (1.6%) vs. 15/1376 (1.1%), p 5 0.64). None of the BLM-associated BC exhibited somatic loss of heterozygosity at the BLM gene locus. This study demonstrates that BLM Q548X allele is recurrent in Slavic subjects and may be associated with BC risk.Hereditary risk factors are strongly implicated in breast cancer (BC) predisposition. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for approximately 15-20% of familial BC clustering among first degree relatives.

17 double heterozygous (DH) breast cancer (BC) patients were identified upon the analysis of 5,391 affected women for recurrent Slavic mutations in BRCA1, CHEK2, NBN/NBS1, ATM, and BLM genes. Double heterozygosity was found for BRCA1 and BLM (4 patients), BRCA1 and CHEK2 (4 patients), CHEK2 and NBS1 (3 patients), BRCA1 and ATM (2 patients), CHEK2 and BLM (2 patients), CHEK2 and ATM (1 patient), and NBS1 and BLM (1 patient). DH BC patients were on average not younger than single mutation carriers and did not have an excess of bilateral BC; an additional non-breast tumor was documented in two BRCA1/BLM DH patients (ovarian cancer and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma). Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis of involved genes was performed in 5 tumors, and revealed a single instance of somatic loss of the wild-type allele (LOH at CHEK2 locus in BRCA1/CHEK2 double heterozygote). Distribution of mutations in patients and controls favors the hypothesis on multiplicative interaction between at least some of the analyzed genes. Other studies on double heterozygosity for BC-predisposing germ-line mutations are reviewed.

Background Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are exceptionally rare neoplasms, which are often driven by rearranged tyrosine kinases. Methods This study considered 33 consecutive patients with IMT (median age, 6.6; age range, 0.6‐15.8 years). RNA and cDNA were successfully obtained in 29 cases. The molecular analysis included sequential tests for 5′/3′‐end unbalanced gene expression, variant‐specific PCR, and next‐generation sequencing (NGS). Results 5′/3′‐end unbalanced ALK expression was revealed in 15/29 (52%) IMTs. Strikingly, all these tumors demonstrated high amount of ALK protein detected by immunohistochemistry. Variant‐specific PCR was capable of identifying the type of ALK rearrangement in 11/15 IMTs with 5′/3′‐end unbalanced ALK expression. The remaining four tumors were analyzed by NGS; two known and two novel (CLTC‐ins6del84‐ALK and EEF1G‐ALK) ALK rearrangements were detected. Five IMTs demonstrated 5′/3′‐end unbalanced ROS1 expression, and all these tumors carried TFG‐ROS1 fusion. Nine tumors, which were negative for 5′/3′‐end unbalanced ALK/ROS1 expression, were subjected to further analysis. Variant‐specific PCR revealed two additional tumors with gene rearrangements (TFG‐ROS1 and ETV6‐NTRK3). The remaining seven IMTs were tested by NGS; single instances of TFG‐ROS1 and novel SRF‐PDGFRb translocations were detected. Conclusions Twenty‐four of 29 IMTs (83%) were shown to have druggable rearrangements involving tyrosine kinases, 20 of these 24 gene fusions were detectable by simple and inexpensive PCR assay, which is based on the detection 5′/3′‐end unbalanced gene expression.

Dps is a multifunctional homododecameric protein that oxidizes Fe2+ ions accumulating them in the form of Fe2O3 within its protein cavity, interacts with DNA tightly condensing bacterial nucleoid upon starvation and performs some other functions. During the last two decades from discovery of this protein, its ferroxidase activity became rather well studied, but the mechanism of Dps interaction with DNA still remains enigmatic. The crucial role of lysine residues in the unstructured N-terminal tails led to the conventional point of view that Dps binds DNA without sequence or structural specificity. However, deletion of dps changed the profile of proteins in starved cells, SELEX screen revealed genomic regions preferentially bound in vitro and certain affinity of Dps for artificial branched molecules was detected by atomic force microscopy. Here we report a non-random distribution of Dps binding sites across the bacterial chromosome in exponentially growing cells and show their enrichment with inverted repeats prone to form secondary structures. We found that the Dps-bound regions overlap with sites occupied by other nucleoid proteins, and contain overrepresented motifs typical for their consensus sequences. Of the two types of genomic domains with extensive protein occupancy, which can be highly expressed or transcriptionally silent only those that are enriched with RNA polymerase molecules were preferentially occupied by Dps. In the dps-null mutant we, therefore, observed a differentially altered expression of several targeted genes and found suppressed transcription from the dps promoter. In most cases this can be explained by the relieved interference with Dps for nucleoid proteins exploiting sequence-specific modes of DNA binding. Thus, protecting bacterial cells from different stresses during exponential growth, Dps can modulate transcriptional integrity of the bacterial chromosome hampering RNA biosynthesis from some genes via competition with RNA polymerase or, vice versa, competing with inhibitors to activate transcription.