Three versions (22-item, 10-item, and 7-item) of the social support questionnaire (F-SOZU) were psychometrically evaluated in two clinical and three non-clinical Austrian samples. The distribution of sum scores in all three versions was negatively skewed; means on the item-level were in the upper region of the five-point scale (M > 4.0) in all non-clinical samples. Internal consistency estimates were found to be satisfying for the total test scores (alpha > 0.85). The 10-item and the 7-item forms correlated highly with the 22-item form total score (r > 0.90). Principal components analysis supported a one dimensional solution in all forms. The discussion focuses on the problem of the highly skewed test scores. It is also argued that the use of the 7-item version might be preferable and more efficient if the researcher is only interested in obtaining a global score for perceived social support.

Although the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) is a widely used instrument in research on suicidal behavior, comparative research on the latent structure of the SIS has been neglected. To determine whether a general factor model of the SIS is supported, alternative factor models of the SIS were evaluated comparatively in 11 clinical samples. The SIS was applied as part of a structured clinical interview to patients after an episode of non-fatal suicidal behavior. The samples were drawn from 11 study centers within the frame of the WHO/EURO multicenter study on suicidal behavior. Three different two-factor and two three-factor models of the SIS were examined in each sample using principal component analysis with orthogonal Procrustes rotation. The factorial structure of the 'subjective part' of the SIS (items 9-14) was strongly supported, whereas an acceptable model fit for the 'objective part' was not found. Possible future revisions of 'objective' SIS items may be worth consideration. As a limitation, the results of the study might not generalize to other samples that use different definitions of non-fatal suicidal behavior.

No abstract

The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is still controversial. The present study attempted to replicate a general two-factor model (cognitive-affective and somatic factors) of the BDI with a confirmatory Procrustes rotation procedure in two clinical samples of patients being treated for alcohol dependence (N₁ = 243, N₂ = 148) and one clinical sample of patients admitted to an acute psychiatric ward because of an act of deliberate self-harm (N₃ = 144). In addition, due to the neglect of gender-specific analysis in factor-analytic studies of the BDI, the two-factor model was tested for males and females separately. The results did not support the validity of the two-factor model in the total samples. Gender-specific findings indicated a better fit of the model in male samples. Possible implications of a gender-specific factor structure of the BDI are discussed.

No abstract