No abstract

The purposes of this study were to rate the attractiveness of different smile variables, to compare the perception of Jordanian laypeople, general practitioners, and orthodontists to altered smile aesthetics, and to identify the threshold where different variables begin to impair smile aesthetics. A smiling photograph of a female dental student was selected and digitally manipulated to create changes in buccal corridor space (BCS), the amount of gingival display, and the midline diastema. These altered images were rated by three groups of Jordanians: 200 laypeople (100 females and 100 males), 200 general practitioners (100 females and 100 males), and 160 orthodontists (40 females and 120 males). Smile aesthetics scores were calculated and comparisons between groups were performed using the univariate general linear model. The results showed that profession and gender affected BCS and midline diastema attractiveness ratings (P<0.001). Wide BCSs, a gingival display of more than 2 mm, and the presence of a midline diastema of any size were rated as unattractive by all groups.

This study was undertaken to assess the factors affecting self-perception and the demand for orthodontic treatment among north Jordanian school children. In total, 1404 students randomly selected to represent five geographical areas of northern Jordan were examined. The students were further subgrouped according to gender (858 females, 546 males), age (985 13 year olds, 419 17 year olds) and rural/urban place of residence (212 rural, 1192 urban). The aesthetic component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) was used as an assessment measure of the need for orthodontic treatment. The self-perception of malocclusion was evaluated by asking each student to identify which photograph on the AC scale most closely matched the appearance of their anterior teeth. The demand for orthodontic treatment was measured by asking the students: "Do you feel it is necessary to have your teeth straightened by an orthodontist?" Differences between the self-perception of malocclusion among the different groups were tested using the chi-squared test.The results showed that the majority of students rated their dentition from grades 1 to 4, with a tendency for the females and older school children to score their teeth as more attractive than males and younger children (P < 0.05, P < 0.001, respectively). Rural and urban school children did not differ in the perception of their own dentition. The self-perception scores of subjects within the no aesthetic need, borderline need and definite need groups differed significantly (P < 0.001). The subjects who reported a definite need perceived their teeth to be worse than the other two groups. The demand for orthodontic treatment was found to be affected by gender (P < 0.01) and rural/urban areas of living (P < 0.05).

No abstract

Males had larger tooth/arch dimension than that of females in the primary dentition stage. Mesial step molar relationship was found in 47.7% of the subjects followed by flush terminal molar relationship in 37%. The majority of children examined had spaced primary dentition.