No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: most robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALP) are performed with the patient in lithotomy, carrying risks of positioning-related complications. Newer robot models have allowed for supine positioning, potentially avoiding these pitfalls. We gauged the current sentiment on patient positioning among surgeons who perform robot-assisted surgery. Methods: we surveyed members of the Endourological Society regarding their practice settings and their opinions on positioning for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Summary statistics were reviewed and data were analyzed using chi-square tests and t-tests. Results: our survey had 92 eligible respondents. The majority were fellowship-trained, with 51% trained in robotics and 57% practicing in the U.S. with a mean of 13 years of practice. Most were working in an academic setting (69%) and performing at least 25 robotic prostatectomies yearly. 28 respondents used the Intuitive Surgical Inc. da Vinci® Xi™ exclusively (30%), and nearly two-thirds used it sometimes. Although 54% of respondents considered using supine positioning, less than half of these surgeons used it regularly, while 75% overall preferred lithotomy. A majority attributed this choice to surgical team familiarity with lithotomy positioning. Surgeons in the U.S. and those using the da Vinci® Xi™ were more likely to consider supine positioning. Conclusions: lithotomy position is the standard for RALP procedures; nonetheless, it poses significant risks that might be avoided with supine positioning. Our survey suggests that, although supine positioning has been considered, it has not gained momentum in practice. Addressing factors of inertia in training practices and one’s surgical team might allow for novel and safer approaches.

There are only two three-piece inflatable penile prostheses (IPP) available to patients in the American market: the AMS (American Medical Systems) 700 TM series (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts) and the Coloplast Titan® series (Coloplast, Minnesota), and data comparing the two are scant. The aim of our study was to summarize the current scientific evidence comparing the two. A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed. A 10-year filter was placed to include only studies published after Coloplast launched the Titan Touch® release pump. Eligibility criteria included articles discussing specifically the AMS 700 TM and Coloplast Titan® models. Further searches for studies on patient/partner satisfaction were conducted. Abstracts were reviewed to include studies focusing specifically on the models we are studying and studies on patient satisfaction using the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire. The Coloplast device demonstrated slightly greater resistance to the stimulated forces of penetration and gravity. Coloplast implants coated with vancomycin/gentamicin had the highest infection rate followed by the AMS penile prosthesis and the rifampin/gentamicin coating had the lowest infection rate. Prosthesis durability and survival were similar between both brands. Overall satisfaction was high but comparisons are inconsistent. The literature is inconclusive about which device is superior. We suggest randomized, multicenter, prospective studies to help further elucidate the highlights of each product.

No abstract