Abiotic stresses are the major environmental factors that play a significant role in decreasing plant yield and production potential by influencing physiological, biochemical, and molecular processes. Abiotic stresses and global population growth have prompted scientists to use beneficial strategies to ensure food security. The use of organic compounds to improve tolerance to abiotic stresses has been considered for many years. For example, the application of potential external osmotic protective compounds such as proline is one of the approaches to counteract the adverse effects of abiotic stresses on plants. Proline level increases in plants in response to environmental stress. Proline accumulation is not just a signal of tension. Rather, according to research discussed in this article, this biomolecule improves plant resistance to abiotic stress by rising photosynthesis, enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activity, regulating osmolyte concentration, and sodium and potassium homeostasis. In this review, we discuss the biosynthesis, sensing, signaling, and transport of proline and its role in the development of various plant tissues, including seeds, floral components, and vegetative tissues. Further, the impacts of exogenous proline utilization under various non-living stresses such as drought, salinity, high and low temperatures, and heavy metals have been extensively studied. Numerous various studies have shown that exogenous proline can improve plant growth, yield, and stress tolerance under adverse environmental factors.

We present a new seed dormancy classification scheme for the non-deep level of the class physiological dormancy (PD), which contains six types. Non-deep PD is divided into two sublevels: one for seeds that exhibit a dormancy continuum (types 1, 2 and 3) and the other for those that do not exhibit a dormancy continuum (types 4, 5 and 6). Analysis of previous studies showed that different types of non-deep PD also can be identified using a graphical method. Seeds with a dormancy (D) ↔ conditional dormancy (CD) ↔ non-dormancy (ND) cycle have a low germination percentage in the early stages of CD, and during dormancy loss the germination capacity increases. However, seeds with a CD/ND (i.e. D→CD↔ND) cycle germinate to a high percentage at a narrow range of temperatures in the early stages of CD. Cardinal temperatures for seeds with either a D/ND or a CD/ND cycle change during dormancy loss: the ceiling temperature increases in seeds with Type 1, the base temperature decreases in seeds with Type 2 and the base and ceiling temperatures decrease and increase, respectively, in seeds with Type 3. Criteria for distinguishing the six types of non-deep PD and models of the temperature functions of seeds with types 1, 2 and 3 with both types of dormancy cycles are presented. The relevancy of our results to modelling the timing of weed seedling emergence is briefly discussed.

Seed scientists and other plant biologists are interested in the measurement of germination because seeds from different individuals, populations, seed lots and treatments can differ in germination percentages, rate (speed) and uniformity. Mean time to germination (MGT) is a measure of the rate and time-spread of germination; however, there is a problem with using this method to calculate germination rate. MGT does not show the time from the start of imbibition to a specific germination percentage. MGT has been used to compare specific pairs or groups of means and to evaluate seed vigour. However, it is not the real time to mean germination but just an index of germination speed. Using MGT is not correct for ANOVA, post-ANOVA or the other comparison tests, because it does not show time to a specific germination percentage. Thus, we recommend that t50 be used instead of MGT. The t50 has all benefits of MGT, but it does not have the problems of MGT in treatment comparisons.

For plants inhabiting unpredictable environments, scheduling germination can be challenging. Various responses to environmental conditions have been evolved by plants; these responses combine with variation in local climate to construct germination niche. Germination process may be regulated by a number of factors, among them, the type of seed dormancy and dormancy cycling play an important role in promoting survival after dispersal. In the present study, seeds of Brassica napus were tested for primary conditional dormancy (CD). Dormancy changes were quantified through seed population thermal germination parameters to test whether different genotypes of B. napus seeds (944, 966, Alestrom, Danube, Okanto and Rohan) are non‐dormant (ND) at the maturity or if they present primary dormancy (D or CD). In a burial experiment, B. napus seeds dormancy cycling in the natural soil seedbank was investigated. Germination of all genotypes decreased at 5 and > 20°C, showing narrower breadth of thermal niche for germination. Dormancy‐breaking treatments lead to the widening of thermal range permissive for germination. The lower limit (Tl(50)) and higher limit (Th(50)) temperatures for germination decreased and increased, respectively, for non‐dormant (after‐ripened seeds treated with GA3) seeds compared with fresh seeds in all genotypes. In fresh seeds, the Tl(50) and Th(50) for various genotypes ranged from 3.61 to 6.5°C and 25.0 to 29.0°C, respectively and ranged from 0.2 to 1.8°C and 35 to 41.0°C in non‐dormant seeds. Thus, fresh seeds of B. napus are dormant at dispersal and adopt delayed germination strategies to avoid summer drought. In the burial experiment, the results indicated that B. napus must have D/ND cycle in which fresh seeds first become dormant and then the cycle begins (CD→D↔CD↔ND), thus adopting both risk‐prone and risk‐adverse strategies to spread the likelihood of survival over time.

Fresh seeds of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) are reported to be nondormant and nonphotoblastic. However, a portion of the seeds can be induced into a light-requiring state (secondary dormancy) for germination and also exhibit dormancy cycling. Thus, if seeds become buried in the soil they can form a persistent seedbank and become a serious volunteer weed in succeeding crops. The capacity of nondormant seeds of B. napus to be induced into secondary dormancy is contrary to results of studies on fresh nondormant seeds of some other species. A reanalysis of published and unpublished data shows that fresh seeds of this species have some degree of primary dormancy and that there is a significant relationship between primary dormancy and the capacity to enter secondary dormancy. However, most germination tests on B. napus have not been done in enough detail to detect primary dormancy (or not) in fresh seeds of this species. The usefulness of information on the relationship between primary dormancy and the capacity of the seeds to enter secondary dormancy is discussed in relation to management of weedy volunteers of this species.