BackgroundWhile foetal distress is typically associated with ischaemic injury, few studies have assessed neonatal morbidity for emergency caesarean section. Moreover, the decision of the anaesthetic technique may be of paramount importance in emergency caesareans, because of the limited time and increased risk. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean indicated for foetal distress.MethodsThis was a single-centre, prospective observational study, conducted between July-2015 and December-2015. The study enrolled parturient with indication for emergency caesarean section after diagnosis of foetal distress, who received either regional or general anaesthesia. The outcome measures were: 1, 5-minute Apgar scores; umbilical blood pH; length of hospitalization; and morbidity, defined as a 5-minute Apgar score <7, need for mechanical ventilation, admittance to a neonatal intensive care unit, or respiratory insufficiency symptoms.Results61 patients were included in the study, of whom 31 received regional anaesthesia. Neonatal morbidity was noted in 5 and 9 cases with regional and general anaesthesia, respectively. The 1-minute Apgar score was significantly lower(p = 0,045) for cases with general anaesthesia, which was not true for the 5-minute Apgar score. Regional anaesthesia was non-significantly associated with shorter length of hospitalization, lower incidence of morbidity, and higher umbilical blood pH. When we take regional anaesthesia cases as a reference point, we detected that general anaesthesia cases are showing 2,2 times more morbidity risk. But these results did not reach any statistically significant levels.ConclusionsWhile we did find some improved results for regional anaesthesia group, we found no statistical evidence that neither anaesthesia technique is superior regarding neonatal morbidity. We think that regional anaesthesia should be preferred whenever possible because of our improved results of length of hospital stay, APGAR and morbidity and we think that general anaesthesia is indicated for very urgent cases or regional anaesthesia contraindicated patients.Trial registrationhttp://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15181117

Aim: Postpartum hemorrhage is a life-threatening obstetric emergent clinical situation accompanied by blood loss of more than 500 ml after vaginal delivery and more than 1000 ml after cesarean section. This situation, frequently encountered in placental adhesion anomalies, is essential in terms of follow-up, treatment, and multidisciplinary management. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the perioperative anesthesia management, transfusion requirement, and postoperative intensive care unit requirement of patients diagnosed with placental invasion anomaly who had an intraoperative hemorrhage Methods: In our single-center study, a total of 58 female patients diagnosed with of placental invasion anomaly with a cesarean section between 2017-2020 were examined. Patients under 18 years of age and missing data were excluded from the study. Demographic data of patients (age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA)), diagnosis, duration of operation, perioperative laboratory findings, anesthesia type, perioperative hemodynamics (highest heart rate, lowest mean arterial pressure, shock index), amount of bleeding, blood products, and fluids used, surgical interventions (B-Lynch, Bacri balloon application, uterine artery ligation, hysterectomy), intraoperative vasopressor/inotrope use, ICU stay, laboratory results in the first 24 hours postoperatively, and total hospital stay were recorded. Results: In the preoperative evaluation, 27 (46.5%) patients were diagnosed with placenta accreta, and placenta previa was diagnosed in 19 (32.7%) patients. Perioperatively mean of 3.08 ± 1.7 units of Red blood cell was used. In patients with postoperative intensive care unit hospitalization, the highest intraoperative lactate value was 3.5±1.8 mmol/L, shock index was 1.3±0.3 (0.6-1.8). In patients given intraoperative fibrinogen concentrate, the intraoperative shock index was 1.5±0.2 (0.9-1.8), the amount of intraoperative bleeding was 2575±302.2 ml, and the fibrinogen levels measured in the first 24 hours after surgery were 294.7±79.7 mg/dl. Conclusions: Anesthesia management of patients diagnosed with abnormal placental invasion is important because of significant hemorrhage. Due to unstable hemodynamics, preoperative blood product preparation with a multidisciplinary approach and a postoperative intensive care unit plan should be made for these patients.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative clinical status on the choice of anesthesia method and the postoperative maternal and fetal outcomes in the caesarean section of pregnant women with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome. Materials and Methods: Pregnant women with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome, for whom caesarean sections were planned, were included in this retrospective study. Clinical features, preoperative findings and treatments, maternal and fetal outcomes in the preoperative period, intensive care needs, and hospital stay were evaluated. Results: Ten patients who underwent caesarean section were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 34±1.82 and the mean gestational week was 33.1±3.88. Chronic disease was present in 44.4% of them. Sixty percent of the patients were admitted to the postoperative intensive care unit. Eighty percent of the newborns were preterm and half of the newborns needed intensive care unit hospitalization. Conclusion: The clinical features of pregnant women with COVID-19 are similar to those reported for non-pregnant adults with COVID-19, but respiratory parameters of pregnant women with COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome deteriorate rapidly and should be monitored closely. Preoperative clinic status and oxygenation are the most important determinants in the selection of anesthesia type for the caesarean section.