Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are proving to be versatile nanomaterials that exhibit superior and attractive electrical, optical, chemical, physical, and mechanical properties. Different kinds of CNTs exist, and their associated properties have been actively explored and widely exploited from fundamental studies to practical applications. Obtaining high‐quality CNTs in large volumes is desirable, especially for scalable electronic, photonic, chemical, and mechanical systems. At present, abundant but random CNTs are synthesized by various growth methods including arc discharge, chemical vapor deposition, and molecular beam epitaxy. An economical way to secure pristine CNTs is to disperse the raw soot of CNTs in solutions, from which purified CNTs are collected via sorting methods. Individual CNTs are generally hydrophobic, not readily soluble, requiring an agent, known as a surfactant to facilitate effective dispersions. Furthermore, the combination of surfactants, polymers, DNA, and other additives can enhance the purity of specific types of CNTs in confidence dispersions. With highly‐pure CNTs, designated functional devices are built to demonstrate improved performance. This review surveys and highlights the essential roles and significant impacts of surfactants in dispersing and sorting CNTs.

The chemical purity of materials is important for semiconductors, including the carbon nanotube material system, which is emerging in semiconductor applications. One approach to get statistically meaningful abundances and/or concentrations is to measure a large number of small samples. Automated multivariate classification algorithms can be used to draw conclusions from such large data sets. Here, we use spatially-mapped Raman spectra of mixtures of chirality-sorted single walled carbon nanotubes dispersed sparsely on flat silicon/silicon oxide substrates. We use non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) decomposition in scikit-learn, an open-source, python language “machine learning” package, to extract spectral components and derive weighting factors. We extract the abundance of minority species (7,5) nanotubes in mixtures by testing both synthetic data, and real samples prepared by dilution. We show how noise limits the purity level that can be evaluated. We determine real situations where this approach works well, and identify situations where it fails.