In a longitudinal study in a Finnish cattle finishing unit we investigated excretion and sources of Escherichia coli O157 in bulls from postweaning until slaughter. Three groups of 31 to 42 calves were sampled in a calf transporter before they entered the farm and four to seven times at approximately monthly intervals at the farm. All calves sampled in the livestock transporter were negative for E. coli O157 on arrival, whereas positive animals were detected 1 day later. During the fattening period the E. coli O157 infection rate varied between 0 and 38.5%. The animals were also found to be shedding during the cold months. E. coli O157 was isolated from samples taken from water cups, floors, and feed passages. E. coli O157 was detected in 9.7 to 38.9% of the fecal samples taken at slaughter, while only two rumen samples and one carcass surface sample were found to be positive. E. coli O157 was isolated from barn surface samples more often when the enrichment time was 6 h than when the enrichment time was 24 h (P < 0.0001). Fecal samples taken at the abattoir had lower counts (<0.4 MPN/g) than fecal samples at the farm (P < 0.05). E. coli O157 was isolated more often from 10-g fecal samples than from 1-g fecal samples (P < 0.0001). Most farm isolates belonged to one pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) genotype (79.6%), and the rest belonged to closely related PFGE genotypes. In conclusion, this study indicated that the finishing unit rather than introduction of new cattle was the source of E. coli O157 at the farm and that E. coli O157 seemed to persist well on barn surfaces.Infection with shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an important cause of serious illness in humans. The pathogenicity of shigatoxigenic E. coli is mainly mediated by genes coding for Shiga toxins (stx 1 and stx 2 ) and attaching and effacing mechanisms (eae) (29). Cattle are considered a major reservoir of this organism (8,33). Humans acquire the infection through ingestion of contaminated food or drinking water, via direct or indirect cattle contact, or through person-to-person transmission. In a recent Scottish case control study, contact and likely contact with animal feces were strong risk factors for E. coli O157 infection (31). Surveys of cattle at slaughter have given point prevalence values ranging from 1.3 to 28% (4, 6-8, 14, 24, 35, 40). In a 1997 Finnish survey, a low prevalence, 1.3%, was found among cattle at slaughter (28). Elsewhere, surveys performed at the farm level have shown herd prevalence values ranging from 7.1% (15) to 28% (41). Prevalence in cattle may be higher during the summer months and early autumn than in the winter (7). Weaned calves and heifers reportedly shed the agent more often than adult cattle (19) and more often than calves that are less than 8 weeks old (18). In several longitudinal studies performed in the United States it has been noted that E. coli O157:H7 is a ubiquitous organism present on most cattle farms (21).Cattle finishing units receive animals from several dairy farms and raise t...

In 1997 the first outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections involving 14 cases occurred in Finland. A case was defined as a resident of Alavus with an episode of diarrhoea between 5 and 17 July 1997, and from whom E. coli O157:H7 was isolated from stool. The investigation included case searching and a population-based case control study. Five primary and eight symptomatic secondary cases of E. coli O157:H7 illness were detected. In the 10 days before the outbreak, all 5 primary patients (aged 3-8 years), but only 6 of 32 population controls from the same age range (Fisher's test, P < 0.001) and 4 of 10 sibling controls (P < 0.05) had visited (but had not necessarily bathed in) a shallow beach popular among young children. Four out of 5 primary cases had remained within 5 m of the beach while swimming and had swallowed lake water compared to 1 of 5 population controls. These analytical epidemiologic findings incriminated fresh lake water as the vehicle of E. coli O157:H7 transmission.

BackgroundStreptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus is a rare infection in humans associated with contact with horses or consumption of unpasteurized milk products. On October 23, 2003, the National Public Health Institute was alerted that within one week three persons had been admitted to Tampere University Central Hospital (TaYS) because of S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus septicaemia. All had consumed fresh goat cheese produced in a small-scale dairy located on a farm. We conducted an investigation to determine the source and the extent of the outbreak.MethodsCases were identified from the National Infectious Disease Register. Cases were persons with S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus isolated from a normally sterile site who had illness onset 15.9-31.10.2003. All cases were telephone interviewed by using a standard questionnaire and clinical information was extracted from patient charts. Environmental and food specimens included throat swabs from two persons working in the dairy, milk from goats and raw milk tank, cheeses made of unpasteurized milk, vaginal samples of goats, and borehole well water. The isolates were characterized by ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).ResultsSeven persons met the case definition; six had septicaemia and one had purulent arthritis. Five were women; the median age was 70 years (range 54–93). None of the cases were immunocompromized and none died. Six cases were identified in TaYS, and one in another university hospital in southern Finland. All had eaten goat cheese produced on the implicated farm. S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus was isolated from throat swabs, fresh goat cheese, milk tank, and vaginal samples of one goat. All human and environmental strains were indistinguishable by ribotyping and PFGE.ConclusionThe outbreak was caused by goat cheese produced from unpasteurized milk. Outbreaks caused by S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus may not be detected if streptococcal strains are only typed to the group level. S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus may be a re-emerging disease if unpasteurized milk is increasingly used for food production. Facilities using unpasteurized milk should be carefully monitored to prevent this type of outbreaks.

In May 2012, an outbreak of campylobacteriosis occurred in southern Sweden at a wedding reception affecting 44 persons. A total of 17 cases were notified (13 were culture positive for Campylobacter spp.). Epidemiological investigation suspected chicken liver pâté as the source of infection. The liver pâté had been deliberately undercooked, lightly fried to keep the right texture and mixed with spices. Campylobacter isolates from six cases as well as three Campylobacter isolates from chicken flocks previously raised by the producer delivering the liver were subtyped using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing. Indistinguishable PFGE profiles were identified among five human and one chicken C. jejuni isolates as well among the two C. coli isolates, one from a human case and one from a chicken. WGS supported the PFGE findings; the six C. jejuni isolates belonged to one cluster. All these six isolates were of MLST type ST 50 (ST-CC 21). This study highlights the importance of a combination of strict biosecurity at the flock-level as well as adequate cooking of chicken liver to prevent transmission of Campylobacter to humans.

A total of 80 human infections by Escherichia coli O157:H7 were documented in Finland in 1997 and 1998. Most were sporadic and their sources undetermined. Five cases not associated with one another, one of which led to secondary transmission within a family, could be traced to five different dairy farms. These five case patients (age range 2-17 years, median age 3 years) were hospitalised with bloody diarrhoea; two of them developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome. All nine human isolates obtained were sorbitol negative, carried the verocytotoxin 2 and eae genes, and produced verocytotoxin and enterohaemolysin. The phage and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types of the human and bovine isolates from the corresponding farms were indistinguishable. The cattle (20-70 animals per farm) were monitored for up to 2 years after the human cases. The proportion of cattle excreting the type that caused the human infections varied from 3.2 to 66.7% when sampled soon after the human cases, and from 0.0 to 5.3% about a year or so later. On most of the farms, the animals excreted the pathogen intermittently. On one farm, Escherichia coli O157 isolates with other characteristics were also occasionally isolated. Although the infections were traced back to the farms, it could not be established whether the source was unpasteurised milk or direct or indirect contact with cattle. The results of this study emphasise the need for special recommendations for children visiting or living on a farm to prevent these infections.