II-2.

Objective: To report on a less invasive treatment strategy in alloimmune fetal and neonatal thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) at high risk for either in utero or neonatal intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Methods: In 7 pregnancies, with a history of ICH in the older sibling, weekly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy to the mother (1 g/kg) without initial cordocentesis was started at a median gestational age of 16 weeks. Results: In 4 pregnancies cordocentesis was avoided. One predelivery cordocentesis with platelet transfusion was performed in 3 further cases. Although none of the cases had a platelet count of >50 × 10⁹/l at cordocentesis, predelivery or birth, no ICHs were observed. The neonatal periods of the infants were uncomplicated. Conclusion: IVIG treatment alone might be considered in patients with both severe platelet alloimmunization and an increased risk for morbidity and mortality at cordocentesis.

BackgroundPain relief during labour is a topic of major interest in the Netherlands. Epidural analgesia is considered to be the most effective method of pain relief and recommended as first choice. However its uptake by pregnant women is limited compared to other western countries, partly as a result of non-availability due to logistic problems. Remifentanil, a synthetic opioid, is very suitable for patient controlled analgesia. Recent studies show that epidural analgesia is superior to remifentanil patient controlled analgesia in terms of pain intensity score; however there was no difference in satisfaction with pain relief between both treatments.Methods/designThe proposed study is a multicentre randomized controlled study that assesses the cost-effectiveness of remifentanil patient controlled analgesia compared to epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that remifentanil patient controlled analgesia is as effective in improving pain appreciation scores as epidural analgesia, with lower costs and easier achievement of 24 hours availability of pain relief for women in labour and efficient pain relief for those with a contraindication for epidural analgesia.Eligible women will be informed about the study and randomized before active labour has started. Women will be randomly allocated to a strategy based on epidural analgesia or on remifentanil patient controlled analgesia when they request pain relief during labour. Primary outcome is the pain appreciation score, i.e. satisfaction with pain relief.Secondary outcome parameters are costs, patient satisfaction, pain scores (pain-intensity), mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal side effects.The economic analysis will be performed from a short-term healthcare perspective. For both strategies the cost of perinatal care for mother and child, starting at the onset of labour and ending ten days after delivery, will be registered and compared.DiscussionThis study, considering cost effectiveness of remifentanil as first choice analgesia versus epidural analgesia, could strongly improve the care for 180.000 women, giving birth in the Netherlands yearly by giving them access to pain relief during labour, 24 hours a day.Trial registration numberDutch Trial Register NTR2551, http://www.trialregister.nl