Introduction. The assessment of PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry is mandatoryfor the administration as first-line therapy of the anti PD-1 check-point inhibitor Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples are acceptable for PD-L1 immunostaining with the anti-PD-L1 antibodies 22-C3 and SP263. We investigated retrospectively the accuracy of the anti PD-L1 antibodies 22-C3, 28-28, SP263 in 50 paired histological samples and cytological smears of NSCLC patients. Results. The accuracy of the three antibodies for the detection of PD-L1 in histological samples was higher for the antibody SP263 (AUC/ROC =1) compared to the clones 28-8 (AUC/ROC =,991) and 22-C3 (AUC/ROC =,942). The overall concordance between histological samples and cytological smears using the SP263 clone was moderate (kappa =0,364). However when the cyto-histological concordance was calculated using just the <50% vs ≥50% cut-off the agreement (kappa =0.626) was good. The accuracy of the antibody SP263 in cytological smears was good (AUC/ROC =,921). A fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis on 10 histological cases positive for PD-L1 at immunohistochemistry showed amplification of the CD274 gene only in one case. Conclusions. Immunocytochemical staining for PD-L1 in diagnostic cytological smears of NSCLC is feasible and applicable at least using the >50% cancer cell cut-off. The three antibodies SP263, 22-C3 and 28-8 are all suitable for the diagnostic detection of PD-L1 on tissue sections with a superiority of the SP263 clone. The implementation of PD-L1 immunocytochemistry on cytological smears will likely expand the pool of NSCLC patients candidate to first-line immunotherapy.
The organic anion transporter peptides (OATP) 1B1 and 1B3 are hepatocytic-specific transporters determinant for the uptake of the contrast media Gd-EOB-DTPA during magnetic resonance, but variably lost in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we studied a series of HCCs from livers that underwent liver transplantation (OLT) and correlated the expression of OATP 1B1/1B3 with HCC morphological features and the expression of the biliary-type keratins K7 and K19, the latter previously correlated with a worse prognosis after OLT. Seventy-five HCCs from 69 OLT patients were evaluated by histology and immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibodies against OATP 1B1/1B3, K7, and K19. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were therefore compared to recipient follow-up data. Thirty-four (45%) HCCs were completely OATP-, and 18 (24%) showed positivity for K7 and/or K19. We observed a significant inverse correlation between OATP and K7/19 expression (P < 0.001): all OATP+ cases were K7/19-, while all K7+ and/or K19+ cases were OATP-. Sixteen cases were negative for all antibodies. No correlation was found between histopathological features and immunohistochemistry. Twenty-five recipients experienced HCC recurrence, and ten died from neoplastic recurrence. Neither OATP nor keratin expressions were correlated with HCC recurrence, while OATP negativity significantly correlated with HCC-related death after recurrence (P = 0.036). In conclusion, HCCs show a progressive loss in OATP immunoreactivity that correlates with the gain of a biliary phenotype. Although further studies are required to define these findings better, our results support the idea that OATP could be used together with K7/19 to identify a phenotypical "spectrum" in HCC progression.
Detection of KRAS mutations in archival pathology samples is critical for therapeutic appropriateness of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Sanger sequencing, ARMS-Scorpion (TheraScreen®) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pyrosequencing, chip array hybridization, and 454 next-generation sequencing to assess KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in 60 nonconsecutive selected cases of colorectal cancer. Twenty of the 60 cases were detected as wild-type KRAS by all methods with 100% specificity. Among the 40 mutated cases, 13 were discrepant with at least one method. The sensitivity was 85%, 90%, 93%, and 92%, and the accuracy was 90%, 93%, 95%, and 95% for Sanger sequencing, TheraScreen real-time PCR, pyrosequencing, and chip array hybridization, respectively. The main limitation of Sanger sequencing was its low analytical sensitivity, whereas TheraScreen real-time PCR, pyrosequencing, and chip array hybridization showed higher sensitivity but suffered from the limitations of predesigned assays. Concordance between the methods was k = 0.79 for Sanger sequencing and k > 0.85 for the other techniques. Tumor cell enrichment correlated significantly with the abundance of KRAS-mutated deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), evaluated as ΔCt for TheraScreen real-time PCR (P = 0.03), percentage of mutation for pyrosequencing (P = 0.001), ratio for chip array hybridization (P = 0.003), and percentage of mutation for 454 next-generation sequencing (P = 0.004). Also, 454 next-generation sequencing showed the best cross correlation for quantification of mutation abundance compared with all the other methods (P < 0.001). Our comparison showed the superiority of next-generation sequencing over the other techniques in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Next-generation sequencing will replace Sanger sequencing as the reference technique for diagnostic detection of KRAS mutation in archival tumor tissues.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.