The mechanisms underlying the low efficiency of reprogramming somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are poorly understood. There is a clear need to study whether the reprogramming process itself compromises genomic integrity and, through this, the efficiency of iPS cell establishment. Using a high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array, we compared copy number variations (CNVs) of different passages of human iPS cells with their fibroblast cell origins and with human embryonic stem (ES) cells. Here we show that significantly more CNVs are present in early-passage human iPS cells than intermediate passage human iPS cells, fibroblasts or human ES cells. Most CNVs are formed de novo and generate genetic mosaicism in early-passage human iPS cells. Most of these novel CNVs rendered the affected cells at a selective disadvantage. Remarkably, expansion of human iPS cells in culture selects rapidly against mutated cells, driving the lines towards a genetic state resembling human ES cells.
Studies using high-resolution genome-wide approaches have recently reported that genomic and epigenomic alterations frequently accumulate in human pluripotent cells. Detailed characterization of these changes is crucial for understanding the impact of these alterations on self-renewal and proliferation, and particularly on the developmental and malignant potential of the cells. Such knowledge is required for the optimized and safe use of pluripotent cells for therapeutic purposes, such as regenerative cellular therapies using differentiated derivatives of pluripotent cells.In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge of the genomic and epigenomic stability of pluripotent human cells and the implications for stem cell research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.