Both neurosurgery and chemotherapy provide unsatisfactory results once paraplegia has been established. Sequelae developed in the majority of study patients and were severe in a half of them. Greater awareness by parents and physicians regarding SEC is warranted.
Primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy is a rare soft tissue tumor. The present case is one of the most invasive primitive myxoid mesenchymal tumor of infancy reported to date. To our knowledge, it is the first case described with extensive involvement of pelvis and the third described developing metastasis and with an invasion of the spinal canal without evidence of transformation into undifferentiated sarcoma. The patient failed to respond to chemotherapy (CHT). According to the few available data, CHT seems to be more effective in the presence of metastatic disease or increased cellularity. However, CHT, including high-dose ifosfamide, resulted ineffective even after lung metastasis development with pathologic evidence of increased mitotic rate. The management of this case and the data in the literature confirm surgery as the gold standard treatment in this pathology.
This study focuses on body image discomfort (BID) of 50 adolescent and young adult (AYA) hematologic cancer survivors (age range 15-23; 52% males). The study results were obtained through data from a self-report questionnaire: the Body Uneasiness Test. Findings differed according to gender: a greater proportion of females were in the Risk category of impaired body image than males (χ = 5.258, p < 0.05). No significant body image differences were found according to the type of diagnosis or to the length of survival. To manage survivors' BIDs and to improve their quality of life, assessing BID in AYA cancer survivors is important for identifying those who might be in need of additional supportive care or a program.
BackgroundInfants diagnosed with stage 4 s neuroblastoma commonly experience spontaneous disease regression, with few succumbing without response to therapy. We analyzed a large cohort of such infants enrolled in the Italian Neuroblastoma Registry to detect changes over time in presenting features, treatment and outcome.MethodsOf 3355 subjects aged 0–18 years with previously untreated neuroblastoma diagnosed between 1979 and 2013, a total of 280 infants (8.3%) had stage 4 s characteristics, 268 of whom were eligible for analyses. Three treatment eras were identified on the basis of based diagnostic and chemotherapy adopted. Group 1 patients received upfront chemotherapy; Group 2 and 3 patients underwent observation in the absence of life-threatening symptoms (LTS), except for Group 3 patients with amplified MYCN gene, who received more aggressive therapy.ResultsThe three groups were comparable, with few exceptions. Ten-year overall survival significantly increased from 76.9 to 89.7% and was worse for male gender, age 0–29 days and presence of selected LTS on diagnosis, elevated LDH, and abnormal biologic features. Infants who underwent primary resection ± chemotherapy did significantly better. On multivariate analysis, treatment eras and the association of hepatomegaly to dyspnea were independently associated with worse outcome.ConclusionsOur data confirm that stage 4 s neuroblastoma is curable in nearly 90% of cases. Hepatomegaly associated to dyspnea was the most important independent risk factor. The cure rate could be further increased through timely identification of patients at risk who might benefit from surgical techniques, such as intra-arterial chemoembolization and/or liver transplantation, which must be carried out in institutions with specific expertise.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13052-018-0599-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
In our population, the cumulative incidence of cardiotoxicity is comparable to rates in the literature. This underlines the need for primary prevention and lifelong cardiac toxicity surveillance programmes in long-term childhood cancer survivors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.