B19 parvovirus can replicate in erythroid progenitor cells and in a small number of human blast cell lines. To better understand and analyze the B19 virus replicative cycle, we performed and compared the infection of bone marrow cells and of different blast cell lines with erythroblastoid and megakaryoblastoid phenotypic characteristics (UT-7, TF-1, M-07, and B1647). Following in vitro infection, B19-specific nucleic acids were characterized with regard to the genome-replicative intermediates, the transcription pattern, and the localization of virus-specific nucleic acids inside infected cells. While all cell lines tested proved to be susceptible to B19 virus infection, two different patterns of restriction to replication of B19 virus were observed. In the first restriction pattern, observed in UT-7 cells, the single-stranded viral DNA was converted to double-stranded replicative intermediates, identical to those found in bone marrow cells, and a full set of viral transcripts were observed. However, replication and transcription were restricted to a small subset of cells, and production of capsid proteins was not detected. In the second restriction pattern, observed in TF-1, M-07, and B1647 cells, the single-stranded viral DNA was not converted to double-stranded replicative intermediates.

In order to evaluate the optimal and essential diagnostic test(s) for a correct diagnosis of B19 diseases, 344 consecutive serum samples were tested from 344 patients with clinical suspicion of B19 infection during an epidemic period (early Spring-Autumn 2000). Sera were tested for B19 DNA by a standardized competitive polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA) and dot-blot hybridization and for specific IgM and IgG by ELISA. Of 344 patients examined, 125 were positive for markers of B19-associated disease: 49 had both B19 DNA and IgM, 50 had B19 DNA without IgM, and 26 had IgM without B19 DNA. After examination of the different patterns of B19 markers as diagnostic tools for B19 infection, IgM determination detected only 60% of B19-documented infections. IgM tests were nevertheless fundamental, as they were the unique diagnostic marker in 20.8% of documented infections (26 of 125 patients), in the diagnosis of recent, but still symptomatic infections when B19 DNA was no longer detectable. The determination of B19 DNA with PCR permitted detection of 79.2% of infections and therefore represented an essential test. PCR was fundamental for the diagnosis of B19 disease, as the unique diagnostic marker in 32% of documented infections (50 of 125 patients), both in acute infections at the onset of symptoms before the appearance of immunological response, and during the course of persistent B19 infections in which IgM had cleared. The contemporaneous determination of B19 DNA by PCR and specific IgM appears to be the most appropriate diagnostic protocol for the correct laboratory diagnosis of B19 infection.

The immune response against parvovirus B19 is mainly directed against the two structural proteins, VP1 and VP2. The amino terminal half of the VP1 unique region has been shown to elicit a dominant immune response in humans, more effective than other linear epitopes and also it has been seen to contain significant neutralizing linear epitopes. Three overlapping recombinant peptides corresponding to amino acids 2-40 (VP1-A), amino acids 32-71 (VP1-B), and amino acids 60-100 (VP1-C) of the VP1 unique region were produced by a procaryotic expression system. These peptides were used as antigens in a Western blot assay to detect specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) in serum samples from blood donors of different age groups with documented signs of a past B19 infection. Fragment VP1-C appeared significantly immunodominant over the other peptides, reacting with specific IgG in 86% of serum samples. The fragment VP1-C corresponds to a sequence with a known neutralizing activity and seems able to elicit a long-lasting immune response because specific IgG were present in blood donors of all age groups. VP1-C would therefore appear to be an attractive candidate as a component of a subunit vaccine.

A real-time PCR assay was developed for quantitative detection of B19 DNA in clinical serum samples. The assay was carried out using a LightCycler instrument and product formation was monitored continuously with the fluorescent double-stranded DNA binding dye SYBR Green I. With an optimized PCR protocol, this system was able to quantitate the target DNA down to 3 x 10(1) genome copies/reaction and to detect as few as 3 x 10(0) genome copies/reaction. Real-time PCR was used to detect B19 DNA in 108 serum samples from patients with a clinical suspicion of B19 infection, showing a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 100% when compared with a standardized PCR-ELISA considered as the standard. Using the LightCycler assay, the entire procedure of detection and quantitation of B19 DNA in clinical serum samples took up to 90 min proving five times faster than PCR-ELISA. B19 DNA quantitation in positive samples by real-time PCR showed a mean of 1.1 x 10(9) B19 DNA copies/ml in samples in the acute active phase of B19 infection (DNA+, IgM+, IgG-), 4.3 x 10(6) B19 DNA copies/ml in samples in the active phase (DNA+, IgM+, IgG+), 3.7 x 10(5) genome copies/ml in samples in the long-lasting active phase (DNA+, IgM-, IgG+) with a statistically significant reduction of B19 DNA content between the group of sera in the acute active phase and the group of sera in the active phase of B19 infection. The high levels of sensitivity, specificity, and rapidity provided by the LightCycler technology for the detection and quantitation of B19 DNA represent a significant improvement for the laboratory diagnosis of B19 infection.

The IgM immune response against conformational and linear epitopes of B19 structural proteins VP1 and VP2 was examined in serum samples with a suspect B19 infection to determine the most suitable antigen for use in IgM detection and also to evaluate a possible relationship between the course of B19 infection and the presence of epitope type-specific IgM. The detection of IgM against conformational epitopes was performed by ELISA using undenatured VP1 and VP2 antigens whereas the detection of IgM against linear epitopes was performed by Western blot assays using denatured VP1 and VP2. IgM immune response against VP1 conformational epitopes appeared dominant, being detected in all serum samples positive for specific IgM, whereas IgM against VP2 linear antigen were found less frequently, being identified in less than half of the B19 IgM positive sera. In the examination of the course of infection, IgM against VP1 conformational epitopes appeared in the active phase of B19 infection at the same time and with the same frequency as IgM anti VP2 conformational epitopes and anti linear VP1 epitopes. IgM against VP1 conformational epitopes were seen to be long-lasting because in the recent phase of infection they were still present when other specific IgM were absent. During the active phase of B19 infection, IgM against VP2 linear epitopes were less frequently found than other specific IgM and in the recent phase they underwent a rapid temporal diminution. The data demonstrate that a sensitive B19 IgM test needs to be performed in diagnostic laboratories by ELISA using conformational B19 antigens; Western blot assays can be used only as confirmatory tests using VP1 linear antigens.